ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Re: Is there still a GNSO?

  • To: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [ga] Re: Is there still a GNSO?
  • From: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 22:41:25 -0800
  • Cc: "J-F C. (Jefsey) Morfin" <jefsey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@xxxxxx>, General Assembly of the DNSO <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Organization: INEGroup Spokesman
  • References: <20050103144908.71580.qmail@web52905.mail.yahoo.com>
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Eric and all former DNSO GA members or other interested
stakeholders/users,

  You need to understand that there are some stakeholders such as
Stephane
whom after running out of invalid arguments to support their positions
and
have been shown clearly to others and recognized by those same others,
that such invalid arguments fail to support their positions, the want to
cry
foul and than blame their own failings on the same others that clearly
debunked the false arguments of those stakeholders/users such as
Stephane's...

Hugh Dierker wrote:

>    There is absolutey no data or empirical proof that the more people
> are involved here, that newcomers or dotcommoners or sages are leaving
> or do not participate. In fact the study we did for the wg-review,
> outreach, showed exactly the opposite. It even showed the more
> rancorous the behaviour here the more productive in terms of reaching
> consensus and shear numbers were at the time. If you think I am off
> base turn on your television for two hours and watch the shows and the
> commercials, it will help tune you in to what sells. Two factors
> seemed to slow the list down. Censoring and frustration of impotence
> levied from the top down. The formation of the fake at-large movement
> and something called the domain name owners also distracted and pulled
> people away.
>
> This list is still monitored and incorporated into the thinking and
> logic of the GNSO. Hendersons' comments here and copied elsewhere are
> known to the community. Youngers' ideas and insight often are
> compelling. Sotirious is always read due to brevity and critique.
>
> Your confusion here Jefsey seems, as has been the case for years, that
> if your desired result is not forthcoming then the system is broken.
> The ICANN elite protects themselves well. If on this list you raise a
> threat to that elitism then you are heard and surely protective
> measures are put in place. Often this is simply giving the small
> people a little more food to stop a revolt.
>
> Eric

Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" -
    Pierre Abelard

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
 Registered Email addr with the USPS
Contact Number: 214-244-4827





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>