<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Promote competition not competitors
- To: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>, icann board address <icann-board@xxxxxxxxx>, Paul Twomey <twomey@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ga] Promote competition not competitors
- From: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 18:30:55 -0700
- Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Organization: INEGroup Spokesman
- References: <20040824135130.46171.qmail@web52905.mail.yahoo.com>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Eric and all former DNSO GA members or other interested
stakeholders/users,
This sort of thing was bound to happen/occur once ICANN made the
decision
to allow WLS even though it was resoundingly rejected by the
stakeholders/users
several times. One can almost count on the ICANN BoD and staff to
create
bigger messes than it had to begin with...
Hugh Dierker wrote:
> I wonder now about this concept.
>
> http://www.icann.org/committees/reconsideration/rc02-5.htm
>
>
> Although Dotster's reference to subsection 2.3.2 of the registrar
> accreditation agreement is new, the arguments concerning competitive
> effects and pricing were presented to and thoroughly considered by the
> Board in adopting resolution 02.100. As noted in the minutes of the 23
> August 2002 Board meeting, the Board recognized that many "registrars
> . . . saw the WLS as an erosion of competition."
>
> The Board as a whole, however, was unpersuaded by those registrars'
> arguments. By authorizing VeriSign to offer a WLS, ICANN would remove
> impediments to competition, not create them. It may (or may not) be
> true, as Dotster argues, that its "NameWinner" service will not be
> able to compete effectively in the marketplace because consumers will
> instead purchase the WLS offering, which provides consumers greater
> security that their subscription will be fulfilled. It may (or may
> not) also be true that consumers will prefer the WLS to NameWinner
> because WLS will be offered through all registrars, while NameWinner
> is available only through Dotster.
>
> Arguments that a proposed new service such as WLS will displace
> existing services because it is more attractive to consumers, however,
> do not demonstrate a threat to competition. Instead, they reflect the
> operation of competition. ICANN's core values support the introduction
> and promotion of competition, not the protection of competitors. See
> Core Value 6. This Core Value is in alignment with subsection 2.3.2 of
> the registrar accreditation agreement; it states that ICANN should
> promote "competition", not "competitors".
>
>
>
> _
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" -
Pierre Abelard
"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Registered Email addr with the USPS
Contact Number: 214-244-4827
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|