<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [ga] dot-IQ
- To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: RE: [ga] dot-IQ
- From: Joop Teernstra <terastra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 22:56:22 +1200
- In-reply-to: <DPEOJECBMOLLLJOFDNDPIEGBFAAA.jolane1@optonline.net>
- References: <5.0.2.1.2.20040515151733.02d84ca0@pop3.paradise.net.nz>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
At 06:57 p.m. 15/05/2004, Joanna Lane wrote:
Do you really think this is a priority in Iraq right now?
ICANN has no business with any *other* priorities in Iraq.
Just this one.
ICANN should pronounce policy on issues of [sanctions] legislation of one
country (the US in this case) vs. the integrity of its Root.
ICANN is also duty bound to take an active hand in
re-establishing "disconnected" TLD's and their domains.
-joop-
www.icannatlarge.com
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|