Re: [ga] More on Sitefinder suspension

[Dan Steinberg <synthesis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

No. I'm trying to say that if with the help of google and text searches 
people cant find the right clauses or texts when it comes to supporting 
their arguments I tend to doubt that said clauses exist in a precise 
form that would tend to support said arguments.
I have been around this block often enough.  Vague recollection of 
clauses and pointing to things that dont exactly prove a point don't 
impress me anymore.  And I doubt they impress  the people who are 
actually in a position to do something either. 
So if you are going to claim that NTIA should step in and use a 
particular clause or clauses I suggest you take the time to reference them.

admin wrote:

> > Same thing for Russ.  If these clauses are so obviously applicable why 
> > do we have to go looking for them?
> >    
>
> Because most people do not have clauses to cooperative agreements memorized.
> This is nothing new or something that has never been used before.  These
> clauses to which I refer cover all cooperative agreements and have been
> around for many years.  The issue is whether NTIA wants to step in and use
> them.
>
> Are you trying to say that because people don't have the clause memorized
> that it cannot be used?  
>
> Russ Smith
>
>
>
>  

--
Dan Steinberg

SYNTHESIS:Law & Technology
35, du Ravin		phone: (613) 794-5356
Chelsea, Quebec		fax:   (819) 827-4398
J9B 1N1                 e-mail:synthesis@xxxxxxxxxxxx