<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [ga] More on Sitefinder suspension
- To: "'Dan Steinberg'" <synthesis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Steven Heath'" <Steven.Heath@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [ga] More on Sitefinder suspension
- From: mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx (admin)
- Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 21:57:45 -0400
- Cc: <ga@xxxxxxxx>
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <3F70C149.5060605@videotron.ca>
- Reply-to: <admin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Same thing for Russ. If these clauses are so obviously applicable why
>do we have to go looking for them?
Because most people do not have clauses to cooperative agreements memorized.
This is nothing new or something that has never been used before. These
clauses to which I refer cover all cooperative agreements and have been
around for many years. The issue is whether NTIA wants to step in and use
them.
Are you trying to say that because people don't have the clause memorized
that it cannot be used?
Russ Smith
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|