Re: [ga] [fwd] UDRP issues report -- ALAC position? (from: roessler@does-not-exist.org)

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Richard and all former DNSO GA members,

  Good question Richard.  However your question has already been
answered.  That answer was The ALAC so called representatives
were not elected but appointed, and cannot legitimately represent
any stakeholder/user.  But of course the same is true of the
ICANNATLARGE.ORG farce of an election as well as is well
documented.

  And so the saga continues...

Richard Henderson wrote:

> "We" being.... ?
>
> Who actually elected the ALAC?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Thomas Roessler <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [ga] [fwd] UDRP issues report -- ALAC position? (from:
> roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
>
> > On 2003-08-21 14:22:27 +0200, Marc Schneiders wrote:
> >
> > > I would like ALAC to take the position that no new names can be
> > > protected until a proper review of the present UDRP has been
> > > completed. So no WIPO-II until the review has been done.
> >
> > We currently take the much shorter position "no WIPO-II" -- which is
> > shared by virtually the entire GNSO, by the way.
> >
> > --
> > Thomas Roessler       <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 131k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" -
    Pierre Abelard
===============================================================
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Contact Number: 214-244-4827 or 214-244-3801