Re: [ga] [fwd] UDRP issues report -- ALAC position? (from: roessler@does-not-exist.org)

["Richard Henderson" <richardhenderson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

"We" being.... ?

Who actually elected the ALAC?


----- Original Message -----
From: Thomas Roessler <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [ga] [fwd] UDRP issues report -- ALAC position? (from:
roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)


> On 2003-08-21 14:22:27 +0200, Marc Schneiders wrote:
>
> > I would like ALAC to take the position that no new names can be
> > protected until a proper review of the present UDRP has been
> > completed. So no WIPO-II until the review has been done.
>
> We currently take the much shorter position "no WIPO-II" -- which is
> shared by virtually the entire GNSO, by the way.
>
> --
> Thomas Roessler       <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>