Re: [ga] [fwd] UDRP issues report -- ALAC position? (from:
Eric and all former DNSO GA members,
Oh sure, more of the "Just do it" process method! Not a good
or productive suggestion or recommendation, Eric. Look at what
that method has done in the ICANNATLARPGE.ORG fiasco!
Eric Dierker wrote:
> Why delay? get it done today!
> > On Thu, 21 Aug 2003, at 14:36 [=GMT+0200], Thomas Roessler wrote:
> >> On 2003-08-21 14:22:27 +0200, Marc Schneiders wrote:
> >> > I would like ALAC to take the position that no new names can be
> >> > protected until a proper review of the present UDRP has been
> >> > completed. So no WIPO-II until the review has been done.
> >> We currently take the much shorter position "no WIPO-II" -- which is
> >> shared by virtually the entire GNSO, by the way.
> > Thank you for bringing me up to date. I'd hope though, that the UDRP
> > review isn't left to further delay. It isn't a short position to push
> > that, but a good one, I think, nevertheless.
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 131k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" -
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
Contact Number: 214-244-4827 or 214-244-3801