Re: [ga] [fwd] UDRP issues report -- ALAC position? (from:

[Eric Dierker <eric@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Why delay? get it done today!
e

> On Thu, 21 Aug 2003, at 14:36 [=GMT+0200], Thomas Roessler wrote:
>> On 2003-08-21 14:22:27 +0200, Marc Schneiders wrote:
>>
>> > I would like ALAC to take the position that no new names can be
>> > protected until a proper review of the present UDRP has been
>> > completed. So no WIPO-II until the review has been done.
>>
>> We currently take the much shorter position "no WIPO-II" -- which is
>> shared by virtually the entire GNSO, by the way.
> 
> Thank you for bringing me up to date. I'd hope though, that the UDRP
> review isn't left to further delay. It isn't a short position to push
> that, but a good one, I think, nevertheless.