ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: 'stakeholders' was: Re: [ga] Re: ICANN before the US Senate...

  • To: jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: 'stakeholders' was: Re: [ga] Re: ICANN before the US Senate...
  • From: Eric Dierker <eric@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 02:51:39 -0700 (PDT)
  • Cc: jandl@xxxxxxxxx, karl@xxxxxxxxxxxx, ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • In-reply-to: <3F375AB4.168F8D05@ix.netcom.com>
  • References: <3F375AB4.168F8D05@ix.netcom.com>
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

linguistics and philosophists tend to argue this point,
it is a grouping that makes a difference. And that is cool.
A stakeholder is far different in Tibet, Iraq, Hopi and NY.
Therefor our language base must be cognizant of differing concepts.
In other words all people are stakeholders in our internet.
Eric

> Leah, Karl, and all former DNSO GA members or other interested parties,
> 
>   I agree with you here as "People" in this construct is misleading
> as to whom AND what IS a Stakeholder.  Stakeholders, are not
> JUST individual "People" they are also entities that encompass
> many individual "People" in various groups or groupings/entities
> as well.
> 





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>