Re: [ga] So, the way that ICANN handles legal objections to TLDS on its website is to delete them?
- To: John Palmer <jpalmer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ga] So, the way that ICANN handles legal objections to TLDS on its website is to delete them?
- From: Rubens Kuhl <rubensk@xxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2014 00:54:27 -0300
You are entitled to an opinion and to seek legal remedy based on it, the
problem is you suggested that you filed an objection and it vanished, and it
turns out you disagree with the objection process requiring paying to the ADR
and never filed one.
The problem with alternate TLD alleged rights is that people might pay your
claims with Monopoly money, as they belong to the same realm…
On Apr 19, 2014, at 12:36 AM, John Palmer <jpalmer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> So typical of the ICANN racket! You can’t even file an objection without
> paying ransom money to their
> hand-picked cronies.
> Sorry – AWI has a legally protected claim on .EARTH. ICANN and the
> applicants will soon be receiving
> formal notification of our intent to defend our copyrighted directory
> From: Rubens Kuhl
> Sent: Friday, April 18, 2014 8:39 AM
> To: John Palmer
> Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [ga] So, the way that ICANN handles legal objections to TLDS on
> its website is to delete them?
> On Apr 18, 2014, at 1:40 AM, John Palmer <jpalmer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Over a year and a half ago, when the objections period for new TLDs was
>> open, I filed a legal objection on
>> ICANN’s website to two applications for the TLD “.EARTH” since these TLDs
>> are the property of my company
>> and we have been operating them since 1995 (and still are).
>> When I look at the ICANN website, under objections for the new TLDs, here:
>> I see that they seemed to have deleted the objections and never even
>> processed them. So, I guess the
>> objections process is just a scam.
> What type of objections your company filed ? The objections, no matter the
> outcome or lack of it, where published by the ADR providers.
> I couldn’t find any objections to .earth on any provider… note that filing an
> objection is not just posting a comment, as you did here:
> Filing an objection is actually following the objection process, paying money
> to the ADR, providing a lots of pages of reasoning… a comment is just a