RE: [ga] Advisory: Availability of Bulk Transfers in Individual gTLDs

["Debbie Garside" <debbie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Danny

I think we have had this conversation before - see my messages of
17/07/2009.

However, there surely must be a document somewhere within ICANN that details
what information may be transferred to the new company.  I hope that billing
information is not included.

Best regards

Debbie

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Danny Younger
> Sent: 09 October 2009 06:11
> To: Andy Gardner; Marika Konings
> Cc: Accountability Headquarters
> Subject: Re: [ga] Advisory: Availability of Bulk Transfers in
> Individual gTLDs
>
>
> Marika,
>
> In the questions and answers just posted on the topic of the
> bulk transfer of names from Red Register to DirectNic we see
> the following:
>
> Q.Why do former Red Register customers need to contact DirectNIC?
>
> A.Red Register did not forward billing information to
> DirectNIC. Accordingly, all registrants must provide updated
> billing information or transfer their names to other registrars.
>
> So here's the question:  What happened to the escrowed data?
> As there were two breach notices sent to Red Register (one in
> May of 2008, and the recent final notice and neither one
> pointed to a breach with respect to escrow obligations), why
> is the billing data unavailable?
>
> In short, does ICANN have an escrow program that works or
> not?  If it works, then there is no logical reason for
> registrants to have to forward their billing data as ICANN
> should have this data at their disposal.
>
> Perhaps you could comment on this situation and clarify
> matters somewhat...
>
> best regards,
> Danny
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>