RE: [ga] Maintenance and Management of the GA
- To: "'ga'" <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, debbie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: RE: [ga] Maintenance and Management of the GA
- From: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 08:17:56 -0700 (PDT)
There are so many coincidences in ICANN it is hard to keep track. Here is your
Generic Names Supporting Organization
Temporary maintenance is being conducted - Thank you for your patience
The file you are trying to reach will be temporarily unavailable until
approximately 0100 UTC, while the GNSO site undergoes technical improvements.
Thank you for your patience while we carry out this work. Please try to access
this file again in a few hours.
Comments concerning the layout, construction and functionality of this site
should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxx.
(c) 2009 The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers. All rights
--- On Fri, 10/2/09, Debbie Garside <debbie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Debbie Garside <debbie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [ga] Maintenance and Management of the GA
To: "'ga'" <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Friday, October 2, 2009, 4:30 AM
I believe an application has already been received for a Non-commercial
In looking at various applications published around about April 09, I cannot
see any results . Can anyone tell me whether any applications have been
successful and if so direct me to a link on the ICANN web site?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Roberto Gaetano
> Sent: 28 September 2009 00:43
> To: 'Andy Gardner'; 'ga'
> Subject: RE: [ga] Maintenance and Management of the GA
> Andy Gardner wrote:
> > I seem to recall the IDNO proved our burden 10 years ago, and got
> > shafted by Esther and her pals.
> > What makes you think we want to go through the same
> shenanigans again
> > when we'll just get a "no" at the end?
> > It'll be a cold day in hell before Registrants get a vote.
> The structure of the GNSO is going to be radically changed in
> Seoul. While in the past the creation of a constituency was
> rather difficult, because it was going to alter the balance
> of power among the different components of the DNSO/GNSO, now
> with the establishment of the Stakeholder Groups the creation
> of Constituencies will not affect the situation outside the SG itself.
> So, if there is any willingness to create a registrant
> constituency, this is the right time. Of course, a new
> constituency has to fit within one of the SGs. For instance,
> an "Individual Non_Commercial Registrant Constituency" could
> easily be created as part of the Non Commercial Stakeholder
> Group (NCSG).