ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Maintenance and Management of the GA

  • To: ga the DNSO <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [ga] Maintenance and Management of the GA
  • From: Andy Gardner <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:06:18 -0500

On Sep 27, 2009, at 9:07 PM, Avri Doria wrote:

On 27 Sep 2009, at 19:43, Roberto Gaetano wrote:

So, if there is any willingness to create a registrant constituency, this is the right time. Of course, a new constituency has to fit within one of the SGs. For instance, an "Individual Non_Commercial Registrant Constituency" could easily be created as part of the Non Commercial Stakeholder Group

And an Individual Commercial Registrants Constituency could be created (easily?) as part of the Commercial Stakeholder Group.

So, who knows, the people on the GA list could conceivably organize themselves into 2 registrant constituencies, not just one.


"If there is any willingness"

"Organise themselves."

One would think, that since ICANN is almost 100% funded by taxes on Registrants, that ICANN should be paying for the "organising" for Registrants from those taxes?

Registrants shouldn't have to "prove" they need a voice in the ICANN process. "Willingness to create"?. They're already PAYING for the process, for chrissake.

Ten years of taxation without representation.


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>