Re: [ga] Maintenance and Management of the GA
- To: ga the DNSO <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ga] Maintenance and Management of the GA
- From: Andy Gardner <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:06:18 -0500
On Sep 27, 2009, at 9:07 PM, Avri Doria wrote:
On 27 Sep 2009, at 19:43, Roberto Gaetano wrote:
So, if there is any willingness to create a registrant
constituency, this is
the right time. Of course, a new constituency has to fit within one
SGs. For instance, an "Individual Non_Commercial Registrant
could easily be created as part of the Non Commercial Stakeholder
And an Individual Commercial Registrants Constituency could be
created (easily?) as part of the Commercial Stakeholder Group.
So, who knows, the people on the GA list could conceivably organize
themselves into 2 registrant constituencies, not just one.
"If there is any willingness"
One would think, that since ICANN is almost 100% funded by taxes on
Registrants, that ICANN should be paying for the "organising" for
Registrants from those taxes?
Registrants shouldn't have to "prove" they need a voice in the ICANN
process. "Willingness to create"?. They're already PAYING for the
process, for chrissake.
Ten years of taxation without representation.