ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Maintenance and Management of the GA

  • To: "'ga'" <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [ga] Maintenance and Management of the GA
  • From: "Gregg L. DesElms" <gregg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 17:00:18 -0700

Whomever is running this list needs to force information at the bottom of every single message with links to the area of the server where users can make changes to their accounts... or even unsubscribe if they want to.

It's not that I want to unsubscribe, but I've been wanting, for some time now, to find out whether there's a daily digest version that I can covert over to.

A set of instructions/links which allow the list members to do whatever they need to do, which are inserted at the very bottom of every single message that this list server kicks out, would would be extraordinarily helpful...

...and would finally make this list compliant with the defacto standards for list management today. That boilerplate instructions/links are not auto-inserted into every message is quite non-standard... and a real irritation.

For whatever that's worth.

Gregg L. DesElms
895 Jackson St., #319
Napa  CA  94559-1321

PHONE: 1-877-383-5148
 FAX: (206) 984-1288
EMAIL: gregg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

----- Original Message ----- From: "Roberto Gaetano" <roberto@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "'Andy Gardner'" <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "'ga'" <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2009 4:43 PM
Subject: RE: [ga] Maintenance and Management of the GA

Andy Gardner wrote:

I seem to recall the IDNO proved our burden 10 years ago, and
got shafted by Esther and her pals.

What makes you think we want to go through the same
shenanigans again when we'll just get a "no" at the end?

It'll be a cold day in hell before Registrants get a vote.

The structure of the GNSO is going to be radically changed in Seoul. While
in the past the creation of a constituency was rather difficult, because it
was going to alter the balance of power among the different components of
the DNSO/GNSO, now with the establishment of the Stakeholder Groups the
creation of Constituencies will not affect the situation outside the SG
So, if there is any willingness to create a registrant constituency, this is
the right time. Of course, a new constituency has to fit within one of the
SGs. For instance, an "Individual Non_Commercial Registrant Constituency"
could easily be created as part of the Non Commercial Stakeholder Group


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>