ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[ga] Re: Old baggage and what my Dr. means

  • To: "Jeffrey A. Williams" <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [ga] Re: Old baggage and what my Dr. means
  • From: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 16:53:21 -0700 (PDT)

Yeah your right, you wouldn't care.
As is evident from the GA archives --- The day after he wrote it, you dropped 
the Dr. from my name. Can't rewrite that history old boy.
But that was the point of writing it now. No one will care. But as we get going 
again, it will be on the record. And do know we will start revving up for Sept 
Dr. Dierker

--- On Thu, 5/7/09, Jeffrey A. Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

From: Jeffrey A. Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Old baggage and what my Dr. means
To: hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: "GA" <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "George Kirikos" <gkirikos@xxxxxxxxx>, "joe 
Babtista" <baptista@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, debbie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "DOC/NTIA ICANN 
Rep" <aheineman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Paul Levins" <paul.levins@xxxxxxxxx>, "Karl E. 
Peters" <kpeters@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "GAC Rep" <ssene@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thursday, May 7, 2009, 2:41 PM

Eric and all,

  What's the point here?  George attacks everyone's credibility that
doesn't agree with every word he says.  Anyone that has read posts
to the GA for any time or has actually reviewed the archives know
this to be a FACT.  Who cares?  I don't.  I don't know George from
adam, and that really doesn't matter as long as what he is attempting
to share with all of us GA'ers is relevant and non-personal.  When
this is not true, than there is a potential problem or problems.

  I called George on the phone, and he seemed rather surprised some
time not so long ago now, and than said I didn't exist.  I recorded it
as well for posterity if for no other reason and had my boss on the
listen in line.  We both got a huge laugh out of it and that was the end

  Debbie is another matter, she clearly has recently demonstrated her
lack of mental sanity publicly.

  The problem here is that rumor seems to trump cold hard facts, or
empirical evidence, which has been and remains a constant problem
when dealing with ICANN and all it's organs.  Hence IMO, why it
needs close adult supervision as well a government oversight as it's
officers and Bod members continually demonstrate they cannot govern
themselves appropriately, and are all too frequently demonstrating
same on several different levels in respect to the MOU.

  BTW Paul Levins, I'm still waiting on that phone call!  It's been
nearly a month now....

Hugh Dierker wrote:

> About a year and a half ago. George went on a nasty little sojourn to
  attack my credibility.His goal was not to hurt me by any means as he
  could give a @#$@$%#.  It was to totally shut down the GA. Well it did
  not work and George is a constant contributor
  (also good read on why I am ????? some kind of chair, although
  footstool is more apt) Also Sotiris attacked my credibility when I
  supported Danny on a multilingual diversity, IDN precurser,
  groundbreaker{MDR 2002}. In this case Sotiris was only trying to limit
  dilution of his domain name investment and keep out consumers as a
  constituency. This obviously did not work either. Way to go IDN and
  folks like Elizebeth who did the hard work. Both attacks were
  basically ignored by me in order not to derail the ongoing greater
  mission. Debbie in 2007 got upset with me -- JW, Dr.Fleming and Cerf
  got upset with me in 2002. Both attacks had to do with my previous
  practice of Law, a Trial Litigator and Member in good standing of the
  CBA, ABA, CTLA and ATLA.  I make no excuses for handling hundreds of
  cases. I would not trade the experience of working for Melvin Belli,
  defending 4 capital murder cases, and defending the rights of
  Homebuyers and Constitutional Free Speech Rights of AEEs for anything
  - well maybe family. It is a trip though defending the Mexican Mafia
  and a man who confesses to murdering his wife. Complaints and charges
  against me?? You have got to be kidding. I was amazed I only had one
  pending when I resigned and went to Mexico for physical commodities
  work. I used to have a tear away sheet with the hotline number and
  prefilled in complaint forms to the State Bar on my office door. I
  represented folks who suffered from chronic victimism.They wanted me
  to sue for them over spilt milk against their neighbor, they damn sure
  would sue a fat rich cat lawyer for clashing clothes. My insurance Co.
  was Lawyers Mutual and they handled all the details and "trust"
  issues. Good God! I was a hired freakin gun. The state bar number and
  complaint are accurate in Georges post. I do remember a worker of mine
  being stabbed over a clients' money, seems it took a detour, but the
  client was taken care of as it were. 6K usd a month premium should buy
  some piece of mind. As to the Dr. Doctorate title. I earned it fair
  and square. About 110k in tuition and fees, over a rather short
  period. BS in Philosophy NAU 1978.. Juris Doctorate -- Thesis on the
  1st amendment and unconstituional taking via "zoning out practice"
  "undisireable" establishments. (read that, bulldozing saloons and
  houses in order to increase the Jones' property value next door) Yes I
  know, most "lawyers" do not take that PHD type track as Bar
  only want the JD. I graduated from California Western School of Law in
  the Spring of 1983, in the 5% of my class -- oops, bottom % that
  is. My full name is Dr. Eric Hugh Dierker, I reside at 2195 Village
  Station Way, San Diego, CA 92108 and my phone is 858-736-4432. Being a
  lawyer in todays society is a little strange. One becomes a licensed
  lawyer in a given jurisdiction. You can see where I am going I think..
  There is no Internet or International license. So if you write someone
  on the net in Texas when you are licensed in CA. you are in serious
  violations of ethics and law. If you are not licensed but are educated
  and do not charge a fee as a lawyer (maybe a consultant) you are clear
  and good to go.I wonder how Microsofts lawyers even think about giving
  the corporate advice, as soon as they say it in Oregon it is advice in
  Japan and New York.. And lordy knows they are paid for it. To me the
  added expense and ass covering (cya) those guys resort to is
  silly. Now when no one cares there it is. Not important but on the

Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 284k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln
"YES WE CAN!"  Barack ( Berry ) Obama

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS.
div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail
My Phone: 214-244-4827


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>