<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] List Rules, moderator and chair
- To: GA <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ga] List Rules, moderator and chair
- From: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 18:58:54 -0700 (PDT)
Thanks George,
But I can't find a reference to your criteria for membership here.
Your list restriction concept might be a dandy idea.
Could you please also draft the explanation letter to netizens who are excluded
from any other ICANN forum, as to why their participation here is unwanted.
Certainly being more restrictive and less inclusive here is a novel idea that
deserves exploration.
--- On Wed, 4/8/09, George Kirikos <gkirikos@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: George Kirikos <gkirikos@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [ga] List Rules, moderator and chair
To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wednesday, April 8, 2009, 4:14 PM
Hi folks,
--- On Wed, 4/8/09, Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> So that we may stand on principles rather than
> personalities, until we have volunteers otherwise, we will
> move with our standing Debbie and Joe as moderators and
> myself as chair, but we will step aside as warranted and Joe
> will have a recusal on the moderation of the current
> consideration of bad taste.
I volunteer to purge this list of those not members of a GNSO constituency, and
turn it into a true cross-constituency mailing list that might actually be
productive, unlike what it has turned into over the past few years.
Avri?
Sincerely,
George Kirikos
http://www.leap.com/
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|