<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga] [Fwd: [dnsext] RFC 5378, the IETF Trust, and consequences on DNSEXT]
- To: Ga <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [ga] [Fwd: [dnsext] RFC 5378, the IETF Trust, and consequences on DNSEXT]
- From: "Jeffrey A. Williams" <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 19:30:22 -0800
All,
As an FYI. Very interesting, especially the referenced
link/url...
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [dnsext] RFC 5378, the IETF Trust, and consequences on DNSEXT
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 23:06:12 +0100 (MEZ)
From: Alfred HÎnes <ah@xxxxxxxxx>
To: namedroppers@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Folks,
if you are not (yet) aware of the legal mess that has come over us ...
It looks like the unexpected exegesis of the text in RFC 5378
-- unexpected even to its authors and IPR WG participants --
now executed by the IETF Trust might have severe consequences
for all future maintenance work on DNS as well.
There is a lengthy thread on the IETF main list -- too annoying
(at least for me) to follow in detail.
However, if you want to quickly get a rough idea of what's going
on, I recommend reading John C Klensin's recent posting to the
ietf-smtp mailing list regarding future work on another 'old'
protocol, SMTP, archived at:
<http://www.imc.org/ietf-smtp/mail-archive/msg05398.html>
If these issues cannot be resolved in a manner the IETF is/was
used to operate over decades, I fear that the BCP 78 update might
severely impede all future work in the IETF on preexisting protocols,
and it looks like this turns into a giant economic stimulus program
for attorneys and legal/IPR advisors. :-(
Kind regards,
Alfred.
--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>
Regards,
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 284k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
Abraham Lincoln
"YES WE CAN!" Barack ( Berry ) Obama
"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt
"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS.
div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail
jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
My Phone: 214-244-4827
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|