<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Call for Elimination of AGP
- To: "John Palmer" <jpalmer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ga] Call for Elimination of AGP
- From: <chris@xxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 15:05:00 -0400
So do I. I think I hear a consensus stampeding toward us. Of course this is
just a bottom up consensus which ICANN has repeatedly ignored in the past.
Chris McElroy
----- Original Message -----
From: John Palmer
To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 11:27 AM
Subject: Re: [ga] Call for Elimination of AGP
I have yet to hear of a valid reason for domain tasting. Karl is correct.
There should not be any refunds for domain
registrations at all for people who are repeat offenders. There isn't any
place for this nonsense as
it takes up valuable resources that no one gets paid for.
I support the call for elimination of the AGP as well.
----- Original Message -----
From: Karl Peters - TLDA
To: Dominik Filipp
Cc: domain-tasting-motion@xxxxxxxxx ; ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 11:16 AM
Subject: Re: [ga] Call for Elimination of AGP
I heartily second the "call for Elimination of AGP" as posted by
Dominik Filipp and for reasons explained on the GA list in the past week and
for reasons not yet even enumerated. No one has yet spotlighted even one PROPER
use of the domain tasting by a major corporation in market study and the
arguments for protection of registrars from credit card fraud and the like are
no more compelling that ANY internet sales related company's difficulty.
Registrars who can not handle the business should drop out of it, as in any
other industry. What makes them special?
-Karl E. Peters
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|