ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Call for Elimination of AGP

  • To: "John Palmer" <jpalmer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [ga] Call for Elimination of AGP
  • From: <chris@xxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 15:05:00 -0400

So do I. I think I hear a consensus stampeding toward us. Of course this is 
just a bottom up consensus which ICANN has repeatedly ignored in the past.

Chris McElroy

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: John Palmer 
  To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 11:27 AM
  Subject: Re: [ga] Call for Elimination of AGP


  I have yet to hear of a valid reason for domain tasting. Karl is correct. 
There should not be any refunds for domain
  registrations at all for people who are repeat offenders. There isn't any 
place for this nonsense as
  it takes up valuable resources that no one gets paid for. 

  I support the call for elimination of the AGP as well.
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: Karl Peters - TLDA 
    To: Dominik Filipp 
    Cc: domain-tasting-motion@xxxxxxxxx ; ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 11:16 AM
    Subject: Re: [ga] Call for Elimination of AGP


           I heartily second the "call for Elimination of AGP" as posted by 
Dominik Filipp and for reasons explained on the GA list in  the past week and 
for reasons not yet even enumerated. No one has yet spotlighted even one PROPER 
use of the domain tasting by a major corporation in market study and the 
arguments for protection of registrars from credit card fraud and the like are 
no more compelling that ANY internet sales related company's difficulty. 
Registrars who can not handle the business should drop out of it, as in any 
other industry. What makes them special?




    -Karl E. Peters


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>