RE: [ga] Re: Proposal: Establishing a Registrant Advisory Committee

[Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>]

Dominik,

I understand that you seek a "fully-fledged Registrant
Constituency with all the voting power".  Such a
proposition is not incompatible with the establishment
of an Advisory Committee.

For example, ICANN has an At-Large Advisory Committee
(ALAC) populated by representatives from noncommercial
organizations.  The activities of the ALAC are not
necessarily at odds with the activities of the
representatives of other non-commercial organizations
(the NCUC) within the GNSO.

This is not an either-or proposition.  A Registrant
Advisory Committee may readily function alongside a
GNSO Registrant Constituency -- of course, under the
new GNSO Improvements paradigm, you will need to
decide whether to create a Commercial Registrants
Constituency or a Noncommercial Registrants
Constituency or both.

best wishes,
Danny


--- Dominik Filipp <dominik.filipp@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Danny,
> 
> I do not agree. Creating an Advisory Committee
> without voting power
> makes no sense to me at all. It would just be yet
> another toothless
> voice lost among many others incapable of
> influencing final decisions.
> Registrants/stakeholders must gain full support and
> respect within ICANN
> they truly deserve.
> 
> Dominik



      
____________________________________________________________________________________
Looking for last minute shopping deals?  
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.  
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping