Re: [ga] Matthew Hooker from Los Angeles ICANN meeting

["Prophet Partners Inc." <Domains@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Joop,

Prophet Partners Inc. is a member of the Internet Commerce Association, which 
is proactive with respect to ICANN issues and sends representatives to ICANN 
meetings. We would also be receptive to discussing a reasonable plan for formal 
registrant representation within ICANN, such as a registrant constituency.

Sincerely,
Ted
Prophet Partners Inc.
http://www.ProphetPartners.com
http://www.Premium-Domain-Names.com


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Joop Teernstra" <terastra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 11:58 PM
Subject: Re: [ga] Matthew Hooker from Los Angeles ICANN meeting


> 
> At 02:08 p.m. 18/01/2008, Prophet Partners Inc. wrote:
>>Hi Jeff,
>>
>>I posted this info to the list because I believe it is important for 
>>people to know who claims to be representing registrant interests.
> 
> Ted,
> 
> If you truly find that important, then why not back a structure where such 
> representatives can be properly filtered and elected?
> 
> Instead of kicking over the  delusional strawman, isn't it better to heed 
> the message : lacking a proper representational structure, a Bill of 
> Registrant Rights is indeed the next best thing registrants could hope for.
> 
> Don't you agree, Roberto?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -joop-
> 
> 
>