Re: [ga] Matthew Hooker from Los Angeles ICANN meeting

[Joop Teernstra <terastra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

At 02:08 p.m. 18/01/2008, Prophet Partners Inc. wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> I posted this info to the list because I believe it is important for 
> people to know who claims to be representing registrant interests.
Ted,

If you truly find that important, then why not back a structure where such 
representatives can be properly filtered and elected?
Instead of kicking over the  delusional strawman, isn't it better to heed 
the message : lacking a proper representational structure, a Bill of 
Registrant Rights is indeed the next best thing registrants could hope for.
Don't you agree, Roberto?




-joop-