Re: [ga] A Root with a view...

[jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]

Stephane and all,

  Your conclusion leaves with the repeatedly ask and 
consequencly unanswerd question of: Why are these 
DNS configuration errors remaining and continuely
repeated unchecked/uncorrected?  Second question:
Why doesn't ICANN exercise some enforcment on the
TLD registries to insist that their DNS is properly
configured, or face immediate dis-accredation?

Kindest regards,
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 277k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very
often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability
depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Phone: 214-244-4827



-----Original Message-----
>From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@xxxxxx>
>Sent: Nov 27, 2007 7:58 AM
>To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [ga] A Root with a view...
>
>
>I cannot find another report about the TLDs most often queried at a
>root name server. Other reports I've seen aggregated data, while this
>small glimpse, however partial, at least *names* the TLDs.
>
>It has been said sometimes that dummy (sorry, Karl, "boutique" TLDs)
>were present in requests to the root name servers. This is clearly
>false, all the non-existing TLDs queried are local domains (such as
>Apple's ".local"), leaking through a configuration error.
>
>http://blog.icann.org/?p=240