Re: [ga] .et wildcarded

[jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]

Ross and all,

  Other than yourself, whom says it isn't a good thing to reduce
traffic to the zone?  Perhaps your DNS omnipitant?  Me thinks
not.  

  Personally I believe there are two schools of thought
on this subject/issue.

Regards,

Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 277k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very
often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability
depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of
Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Phone: 214-244-4827

 

-----Original Message-----
>From: Ross Rader <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Nov 19, 2007 5:09 AM
>To: Joe Baptista <baptista@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Cc: Bashar Al-Abdulhadi <bashar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> GA" 
><ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: [ga] .et wildcarded
>
>
>
>On 18-Nov-07, at 9:17 PM, Joe Baptista wrote:
>
>> Wildcards in fact are a good thing from the dns perspective.  They  
>> reduce overall traffic to the zone.
>
>
>That's ridiculous.
>
>Who says reducing traffic to the zone is a good thing?
>
>Ross Rader
>Director, Retail Services
>t. 416.538.5492
>c. 416.828.8783
>http://www.domaindirect.com
>
>"To solve the problems of today, we must focus on tomorrow."
>- Erik Nupponen
>
>
>
>