Re: [ga] Agendas

[Ken Stubbs <kstubbs@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I fully support this effort..

Ken Stubbs

Ross Rader wrote:
> Roberto Gaetano wrote:
> > My personal position is that the GA should be a mailing list that all 
> > people
> > participating to the GNSO processes, either as individuals, or as
> > representatives of an organization, can subscribe to. This is matter 
> > under
> > discussion in the GNSO Review WG, as many other options are possible.
> > The GNSO Review WG plans to have a draft document ready for 
> > discussion in
> > LA.
> That is great news Roberto.
>
> It would be nice if said list was divested of any legacy baggage and 
> institutional trappings. i.e. it would be great for the GNSO to have a 
> simple, humble list called "discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" that we could use 
> to discuss issues amongst each other and with interested parties.
> I think the interested parties portion is important and I understand 
> the risks associated with it. This might perhaps be handled on an 
> invitational basis or similar.