RE: [ga] Agendas

["Debbie Garside" <debbie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ross wrote:

> It would be a nice adaptation if you started referring
> instead to the "GA-List" and the "mailing list subscribers".

I think this could solve a lot of arguments and would also give subscribers
something to aim for - the reformation of the GA proper.

Best regards

Debbie

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ross Rader
> Sent: 05 October 2007 17:37
> Cc: GA
> Subject: Re: [ga] Agendas
>
>
> Hugh Dierker wrote:
>
> > I am willing to adapt in order to keep things progressing.
>
> It would be a nice adaptation if you started referring
> instead to the "GA-List" and the "mailing list subscribers".
> The GA is not an institution and doesn't exist any more than
> Harry Potter or Jeff Williams. Repeating it as some sort of
> fact won't wish it into existence.
>
> That said, I think there's a bright future for the mailing
> list and its subscribers provided that the reasonable
> subscribers start imposing their rationality on the discussion.
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Ross Rader
> Director, Retail Services
> Tucows Inc.
>
> http://www.domaindirect.com
> t. 416.538.5492
>
>
>