ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[dow2tf]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [dow2tf] Teams


To be true, no it doesn't but as long as the teams are truly balanced I can
live with the situation.

Best,

tom

Am 11.02.2004 schrieb Cade,Marilyn S - LGCRP:
>  I assume we will discuss and even debate different policy recommendations as a full task force... which should address your concern, Tom. 
> 
> 
> 
> Marilyn S. Cade
> AT&T Law & Government Affairs
> 1120 20th Street, NW, Suite 1000N
> Washington, DC 20036
> 
> 202-457-2106v
> 281-664-9731 e-fax
> 202-360-1196 c
> mcade@xxxxxxx
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jordyn A. Buchanan [mailto:jbuchanan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 10:46 AM
> To: Thomas Keller
> Cc: Niklas Lagergren; Steve Metalitz; '2DOW2tf'
> Subject: Re: [dow2tf] Teams
> 
> 
> Tom:
> 
> I'm going to use a liberal interpretation of the council's desire to 
> have alternates contribute "facts" as opposed to "opinions" in this 
> context.  As you point out, we have a large amount of data to analyze 
> and present, and I think we'd be doing ourselves a disservice to limit 
> the number of people that can contribute to that effort.  Keep in mind 
> that it is not practical for any given constituency to be represented 
> on all off the teams, so it's hard to adhere to the "balancing" 
> rationale behind the council's decision to limit alternate's 
> participation.
> 
> In allocating teams, I will definitely attempt to make an attempt to 
> limit the probability that selective analysis of data will take place, 
> although we seem to be working with a group of people where such a 
> concern seems unnecessary.
> 
> Jordyn
> 
> 
> On Feb 11, 2004, at 3:35 AM, Thomas Keller wrote:
> 
> > Steve, all,
> >
> > I don't think that the councils permission to have alternates includes
> > doing work for the taskforce. It was even stated several times that
> > the alternate must only fill in if the primary rep is not available.
> > I don't see this rule changing only because we split the TF into teams.
> >
> > Nevertheless having in mind the (hopefully) huge amout of data we have 
> > to
> > review this kind of sharing the workload might make sense but we first 
> > have
> > to make sure that all constituency are represented equally. As far as I
> > know have not all cons. choosen a alternate.
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > tom
> >
> >
> > Am 10.02.2004 schrieb Steve Metalitz:
> >> Jordyn,
> >>
> >> On behalf of IPC, I will serve on team 1 and 2 and Nik will cover 
> >> team 3.
> >>
> >> Steve Metalitz
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Jordyn A. Buchanan [mailto:jbuchanan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 10:09 AM
> >> To: '2DOW2tf'
> >> Subject: [dow2tf] Teams
> >>
> >>
> >> Just a reminder to everyone that I need your preference for data
> >> analysis team participation by the end of the day today.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Jordyn
> >>
> >>
> >
> > Gruss,
> >
> > tom
> >
> > (__)
> > (OO)_____
> > (oo)    /|\	A cow is not entirely full of
> >   | |--/ | *    milk some of it is hamburger!
> >   w w w  w
> >
> 
> 
> 

Gruss,

tom

(__)        
(OO)_____  
(oo)    /|\	A cow is not entirely full of
  | |--/ | *    milk some of it is hamburger!
  w w w  w  



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>