ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [dow2tf] Teams

  • To: "Jordyn A. Buchanan" <jbuchanan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Thomas Keller" <tom@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [dow2tf] Teams
  • From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGCRP" <mcade@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 11:07:29 -0500
  • Cc: "Niklas Lagergren" <Niklas_Lagergren@xxxxxxxx>, "Steve Metalitz" <metalitz@xxxxxxxx>, "2DOW2tf" <dow2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Sender: owner-dow2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcPwtjQ3KPlzd5vMRmigUQOlv3xeRwAAsGLg
  • Thread-topic: [dow2tf] Teams

 I assume we will discuss and even debate different policy recommendations as a full task force... which should address your concern, Tom. 

Marilyn S. Cade
AT&T Law & Government Affairs
1120 20th Street, NW, Suite 1000N
Washington, DC 20036

281-664-9731 e-fax
202-360-1196 c

-----Original Message-----
From: Jordyn A. Buchanan [mailto:jbuchanan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 10:46 AM
To: Thomas Keller
Cc: Niklas Lagergren; Steve Metalitz; '2DOW2tf'
Subject: Re: [dow2tf] Teams


I'm going to use a liberal interpretation of the council's desire to 
have alternates contribute "facts" as opposed to "opinions" in this 
context.  As you point out, we have a large amount of data to analyze 
and present, and I think we'd be doing ourselves a disservice to limit 
the number of people that can contribute to that effort.  Keep in mind 
that it is not practical for any given constituency to be represented 
on all off the teams, so it's hard to adhere to the "balancing" 
rationale behind the council's decision to limit alternate's 

In allocating teams, I will definitely attempt to make an attempt to 
limit the probability that selective analysis of data will take place, 
although we seem to be working with a group of people where such a 
concern seems unnecessary.


On Feb 11, 2004, at 3:35 AM, Thomas Keller wrote:

> Steve, all,
> I don't think that the councils permission to have alternates includes
> doing work for the taskforce. It was even stated several times that
> the alternate must only fill in if the primary rep is not available.
> I don't see this rule changing only because we split the TF into teams.
> Nevertheless having in mind the (hopefully) huge amout of data we have 
> to
> review this kind of sharing the workload might make sense but we first 
> have
> to make sure that all constituency are represented equally. As far as I
> know have not all cons. choosen a alternate.
> Best,
> tom
> Am 10.02.2004 schrieb Steve Metalitz:
>> Jordyn,
>> On behalf of IPC, I will serve on team 1 and 2 and Nik will cover 
>> team 3.
>> Steve Metalitz
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jordyn A. Buchanan [mailto:jbuchanan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 10:09 AM
>> To: '2DOW2tf'
>> Subject: [dow2tf] Teams
>> Just a reminder to everyone that I need your preference for data
>> analysis team participation by the end of the day today.
>> Thanks,
>> Jordyn
> Gruss,
> tom
> (__)
> (OO)_____
> (oo)    /|\	A cow is not entirely full of
>   | |--/ | *    milk some of it is hamburger!
>   w w w  w

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>