<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] Voting Statements
Please find the response from Thomas attached. It may not have gotten to the
Council list as I was not able to find it back in the archives (I suspect that
Thomas may no longer have posting rights?).
Best regards,
Marika
From: Marilia Maciel <mariliamaciel@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:mariliamaciel@xxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Wednesday 16 March 2016 at 14:00
To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>>
Cc: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>>, Paul
McGrady <policy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:policy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>, "GNSO Council
List (council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>)"
<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: Re: [council] Voting Statements
Dear James and Marika,
Thank you for the clarifications. Did we receive a clarification from Thomas?
Best wishes,
Marília
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 6:30 PM, Marika Konings
<marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
To your first question, yes, I believe that is correct.
Best regards,
Marika
On 14/03/16 13:57,
"owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of
James M.
Bladel" <owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
wrote:
>
>Thanks, Marika.
>
>If I¹m understanding your message, we sent all materials to CCWG-ACCT, and
>these were references in their submission to the Board...but we have no
>confirmation that the Board included these materials in their submission
>to NTIA. Is this correct?
>
>If so, then perhaps we could raise this question with Thomas. And I
>presume there is nothing to prevent us from submitting these directly to
>the folks at NTIA.
>
>Thank you,
>
>J.
>
>
>On 3/14/16, 11:00 ,
>"owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf
>of Marika
>Konings" <owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
>behalf of
>marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
>>Paul, for your information, please find attached the transmittal message
>>from the CCWG-Accountability to the ICANN Board, which includes a link to
>>the message that James sent which included the transmittal letter and
>>attachments with statements as well as voting record. The transmittal
>>message from the ICANN Board to NTIA can be found here
>>http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/2016-March/0
>>1
>>1
>>720.html. As far as I can tell, the ICANN Board transmittal does not seem
>>to include the details of the consideration by the different chartering
>>organisations, but I may have missed it as there are a number of
>>attachments that have been provided.
>>
>>Best regards,
>>
>>Marika
>>
>>On 14/03/16 09:00,
>>"owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf
>>of Paul
>>McGrady" <owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>on behalf of
>>policy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:policy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>James,
>>>
>>>Can you confirm that, as promised, the CCWG-ACCT passed along the
>>>various
>>>voting statements to the Board and the Board, in turn, has passed them
>>>along to the NTIA? These are an important part of the record and we
>>>were
>>>assured they would end up in the hands of the NTIA. Hopefully, that
>>>happened as advertised. Thanks for checking and getting back to the List
>>>with news.
>>>
>>>Best,
>>>Paul
>>>
>>>
>>>Sent from my iPhone
>>
>
>
--
Marília Maciel
Pesquisadora Gestora - Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade - FGV Direito Rio
Researcher and Coordinator - Center for Technology & Society - FGV Law School
http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts
DiploFoundation associate - www.diplomacy.edu<http://www.diplomacy.edu>
PoliTICs Magazine Advisory Committee - http://www.politics.org.br/
Subscribe "Digital Rights: Latin America & the Caribbean" -
http://www.digitalrightslac.net/en
--- Begin Message ---
Hi James,
I can confirm that we have referenced to all papers form the Chartering
Organizations and the GNSO repsonse includes the IPC statement, amongst
others.
While I have not seen (but it may just be me) reference to the
Chartering Organizations' letters in the Board submission to NTIA, I
should mention that NTIA representatives are on the CCWG list and have
therefore taken note of the Chartering Orgs statements.
I hope this helps.
Thomas
Am 14.03.2016 um 20:57 schrieb James M. Bladel:
> Thanks, Marika.
>
> If I¹m understanding your message, we sent all materials to CCWG-ACCT, and
> these were references in their submission to the Board...but we have no
> confirmation that the Board included these materials in their submission
> to NTIA. Is this correct?
>
> If so, then perhaps we could raise this question with Thomas. And I
> presume there is nothing to prevent us from submitting these directly to
> the folks at NTIA.
>
> Thank you,
>
> J.
>
>
> On 3/14/16, 11:00 , "owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Marika
> Konings" <owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of
> marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Paul, for your information, please find attached the transmittal message
> >from the CCWG-Accountability to the ICANN Board, which includes a link to
>> the message that James sent which included the transmittal letter and
>> attachments with statements as well as voting record. The transmittal
>> message from the ICANN Board to NTIA can be found here
>> http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/2016-March/01
>> 1
>> 720.html. As far as I can tell, the ICANN Board transmittal does not seem
>> to include the details of the consideration by the different chartering
>> organisations, but I may have missed it as there are a number of
>> attachments that have been provided.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Marika
>>
>> On 14/03/16 09:00, "owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Paul
>> McGrady" <owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of
>> policy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> James,
>>>
>>> Can you confirm that, as promised, the CCWG-ACCT passed along the various
>>> voting statements to the Board and the Board, in turn, has passed them
>>> along to the NTIA? These are an important part of the record and we were
>>> assured they would end up in the hands of the NTIA. Hopefully, that
>>> happened as advertised. Thanks for checking and getting back to the List
>>> with news.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Paul
>>>
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>
--
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|