Re: [council] Voting Statements

[Marilia Maciel <mariliamaciel@xxxxxxxxx>]

Dear James and Marika,
Thank you for the clarifications. Did we receive a clarification from
Thomas?
Best wishes,
Marília

On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 6:30 PM, Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

>
> To your first question, yes, I believe that is correct.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Marika
>
> On 14/03/16 13:57, "owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of James M.
> Bladel" <owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >Thanks, Marika.
> >
> >If I¹m understanding your message, we sent all materials to CCWG-ACCT, and
> >these were references in their submission to the Board...but we have no
> >confirmation that the Board included these materials in their submission
> >to NTIA.  Is this correct?
> >
> >If so, then perhaps we could raise this question with Thomas.  And I
> >presume there is nothing to prevent us from submitting these directly to
> >the folks at NTIA.
> >
> >Thank you,
> >
> >J.
> >
> >
> >On 3/14/16, 11:00 , "owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Marika
> >Konings" <owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of
> >marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >>Paul, for your information, please find attached the transmittal message
> >>from the CCWG-Accountability to the ICANN Board, which includes a link to
> >>the message that James sent which included the transmittal letter and
> >>attachments with statements as well as voting record. The transmittal
> >>message from the ICANN Board to NTIA can be found here
> >>
> http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/2016-March/0
> >>1
> >>1
> >>720.html. As far as I can tell, the ICANN Board transmittal does not seem
> >>to include the details of the consideration by the different chartering
> >>organisations, but I may have missed it as there are a number of
> >>attachments that have been provided.
> >>
> >>Best regards,
> >>
> >>Marika
> >>
> >>On 14/03/16 09:00, "owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Paul
> >>McGrady" <owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of
> >>policy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>>James,
> >>>
> >>>Can you confirm that, as promised, the CCWG-ACCT passed along the
> >>>various
> >>>voting statements to the Board and the Board, in turn, has passed them
> >>>along to the NTIA?  These are an important part of the record and we
> >>>were
> >>>assured they would end up in the hands of the NTIA. Hopefully, that
> >>>happened as advertised. Thanks for checking and getting back to the List
> >>>with news.
> >>>
> >>>Best,
> >>>Paul
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Sent from my iPhone
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
>


-- 
*Marília Maciel*
Pesquisadora Gestora - Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade - FGV Direito Rio
Researcher and Coordinator - Center for Technology & Society - FGV Law
School
http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts

DiploFoundation associate - www.diplomacy.edu
PoliTICs Magazine Advisory Committee - http://www.politics.org.br/
Subscribe "Digital Rights: Latin America & the Caribbean" -
http://www.digitalrightslac.net/en