ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] Voting Statements

  • To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>, Paul McGrady <policy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "GNSO Council List (council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] Voting Statements
  • From: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 19:57:28 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Authentication-results: icann.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;icann.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=godaddy.com;
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=secureservernet.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-godaddy-com; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=xmyFEjhbFkaGsgSEMIpRuCxtDvL7qs5ow3VOl9zZzHw=; b=YCYzvwOl67uphGRtDdEPTHNzig4oSwRyHY5g9ClSWg5359/oXd8I02XWG5gFFn2lqNVT/LZk685xlicItkFq7z/Ny0IItU/Vbu5EHL5pCLBdLBl9i3Lia9BshmpcHZgLpZs/9aKB0TxyBLjlK8vXyVsfgD3qjffNe9MXOaYG3Rg=
  • In-reply-to: <D30C397F.65DD6%marika.konings@icann.org>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <89A78B49-85D7-4092-8D1B-A45E49C22A2A@paulmcgrady.com> <D30C397F.65DD6%marika.konings@icann.org>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
  • Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
  • Thread-index: AQHRfghEb5+LgL1tcEie+o85SJ3uAZ9ZGUSA///uPoA=
  • Thread-topic: [council] Voting Statements
Thanks, Marika.  

If I¹m understanding your message, we sent all materials to CCWG-ACCT, and
these were references in their submission to the Board...but we have no
confirmation that the Board included these materials in their submission
to NTIA.  Is this correct?

If so, then perhaps we could raise this question with Thomas.  And I
presume there is nothing to prevent us from submitting these directly to
the folks at NTIA.

Thank you,

J.


On 3/14/16, 11:00 , "owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Marika
Konings" <owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of
marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>Paul, for your information, please find attached the transmittal message
>from the CCWG-Accountability to the ICANN Board, which includes a link to
>the message that James sent which included the transmittal letter and
>attachments with statements as well as voting record. The transmittal
>message from the ICANN Board to NTIA can be found here
>http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/2016-March/01
>1
>720.html. As far as I can tell, the ICANN Board transmittal does not seem
>to include the details of the consideration by the different chartering
>organisations, but I may have missed it as there are a number of
>attachments that have been provided.
>
>Best regards,
>
>Marika  
>
>On 14/03/16 09:00, "owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Paul
>McGrady" <owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of
>policy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>
>>James,
>>
>>Can you confirm that, as promised, the CCWG-ACCT passed along the various
>>voting statements to the Board and the Board, in turn, has passed them
>>along to the NTIA?  These are an important part of the record and we were
>>assured they would end up in the hands of the NTIA. Hopefully, that
>>happened as advertised. Thanks for checking and getting back to the List
>>with news. 
>>
>>Best,
>>Paul
>>
>>
>>Sent from my iPhone
>
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>