<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] Proposed Edit to Council Letter to CCWG-ACCT
- To: "Paul McGrady (Policy)" <policy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Johan Helsingius'" <julf@xxxxxxxx>, "'WUKnoben'" <wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] Proposed Edit to Council Letter to CCWG-ACCT
- From: Phil Corwin <psc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 19:58:07 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
- Cc: "egmorris1@xxxxxxxxx" <egmorris1@xxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <013201d1547c$1edf8ce0$5c9ea6a0$@paulmcgrady.com>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <8E84A14FB84B8141B0E4713BAFF5B84E1DFD7D64@Exchange.sierracorporation.com> <A75DF158AEC241CDB577CA19F0D2C266@WUKPC> <7eadee26d7804b24a877b2ba0a7d4c80@toast.net> <56A1181F.80205@julf.com> <CF3B5C0CE7094B39A0F97AEF036A788B@WUKPC> <56A11E8D.40602@julf.com> <013201d1547c$1edf8ce0$5c9ea6a0$@paulmcgrady.com>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AdFUXZN4+d0iAMN9QiGe/z7JEvTXVwANxpsAAAEgMQAAAOWggAAAen2AAAB6yYAAAVszgAAIAkmQ
- Thread-topic: [council] Proposed Edit to Council Letter to CCWG-ACCT
Perhaps not a formal vote, but an informal straw poll, if necessary?
Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal
Virtualaw LLC
1155 F Street, NW
Suite 1050
Washington, DC 20004
202-559-8597/Direct
202-559-8750/Fax
202-255-6172/cell
Twitter: @VlawDC
"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Paul McGrady (Policy)
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2016 1:47 PM
To: 'Johan Helsingius'; 'WUKnoben'; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: egmorris1@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [council] Proposed Edit to Council Letter to CCWG-ACCT
I do not support any rushed votes on today's call, with no notice to my C that
such a vote would be happening and no ability to get instructions, if that is
what is being proposed.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Johan Helsingius
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2016 12:08 PM
To: WUKnoben; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: egmorris1@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [council] Proposed Edit to Council Letter to CCWG-ACCT
Wolf-Ulrich,
> you're right, there is not overall support; but the reverse that the
> GNSO overall doesn't support rec 11 is also not correct.
I agree - or, rather, to be really precise, we don't actually know how strong
or weak the support is. We know not everybody supports it, and we know not
everybody is against it. Therefore I support the suggestion Ed proposed to have
a vote to find out the exact degree of support.
Julf
-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2016.0.7227 / Virus Database: 4489/11316 - Release Date: 01/03/16
Internal Virus Database is out of date.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|