<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] Proposed Edit to Council Letter to CCWG-ACCT
Julf,
you're right, there is not overall support; but the reverse that the GNSO
overall doesn't support rec 11 is also not correct.
Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
From: Johan Helsingius
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2016 6:40 PM
To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: egmorris1@xxxxxxxxx ; WUKnoben
Subject: Re: [council] Proposed Edit to Council Letter to CCWG-ACCT
I agree with Ed on Rec 11.
I am not sure there is overall support for recommendation 11.
I, for one, do not support the current wording.
Julf
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|