GNSO Email Archives: [council]

ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]

<<< Chronological Index >>> <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] Proposed Edit to Council Letter to CCWG-ACCT

To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [council] Proposed Edit to Council Letter to CCWG-ACCT
From: Johan Helsingius <julf@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 18:40:47 +0100
Cc: egmorris1@xxxxxxxxx, WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <7eadee26d7804b24a877b2ba0a7d4c80@toast.net>
List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
References: <8E84A14FB84B8141B0E4713BAFF5B84E1DFD7D64@Exchange.sierracorporation.com> <A75DF158AEC241CDB577CA19F0D2C266@WUKPC> <7eadee26d7804b24a877b2ba0a7d4c80@toast.net>
Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1

I agree with Ed on Rec 11.

I am not sure there is overall support for recommendation 11.
I, for one, do not support the current wording.

        Julf

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [council] Proposed Edit to Council Letter to CCWG-ACCT
  - From: WUKnoben

References:
- [council] Proposed Edit to Council Letter to CCWG-ACCT
  - From: Phil Corwin
- Re: [council] Proposed Edit to Council Letter to CCWG-ACCT
  - From: WUKnoben
- Re: [council] Proposed Edit to Council Letter to CCWG-ACCT
  - From: Edward Morris

<<< Chronological Index >>> <<< Thread Index >>>