RE: [council] Proposed Edit to Council Letter to CCWG-ACCT

["Paul McGrady \(Policy\)" <policy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I do not support any rushed votes on today's call, with no notice to my C
that such a vote would be happening and no ability to get instructions, if
that is what is being proposed.  

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Johan Helsingius
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2016 12:08 PM
To: WUKnoben; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: egmorris1@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [council] Proposed Edit to Council Letter to CCWG-ACCT


Wolf-Ulrich,

> you're right, there is not overall support; but the reverse that the 
> GNSO overall doesn't support rec 11 is also not correct.

I agree - or, rather, to be really precise, we don't actually know how
strong or weak the support is. We know not everybody supports it, and we
know not everybody is against it. Therefore I support the suggestion Ed
proposed to have a vote to find out the exact degree of support.

        Julf