Re: [council] NomCom appointee skill sets

[David Cake <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

That looks good to me

David

On 11 Dec 2014, at 1:30 pm, Reed, Daniel A <dan-reed@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Ah, sorry for the confusion.  Here it is moved to the other category
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Cake [mailto:dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 7:38 PM
> To: Reed, Daniel A
> Cc: jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [council] NomCom appointee skill sets
> 
> Actually, that isn't what I intended - I was asking for 
>               * Knowledge of privacy and data protection laws and 
> implications to the be included in the Variable Criteria under the  
> "Knowledge of and experience with:" list. 
> 
> That is, I was asking for NomCom to consider sending us someone with 
> significant experience in this area if possible, rather than adding it to the 
> minimum criteria that all NomCom appointed councillors are expected to have. 
> 
> Other than that, the changes look good, and thank you for being the pen 
> holder on this one Dan. 
> 
> Regards
> 
>       David
> 
> On 9 Dec 2014, at 5:30 am, Reed, Daniel A <dan-reed@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> <NomCom - GNSO Candidate Criteria--DARV2.docx>
> 
> <NomCom - GNSO Candidate Criteria--DARV3.docx>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail