<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] RE: Item 8 lead
- To: "'John Berard'" <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] RE: Item 8 lead
- From: "Jonathan Robinson" <jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 10:32:25 +0100
- Cc: <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <111D2F94-2031-4EFC-8E5C-378C21A1D746@crediblecontext.com>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Organization: Afilias
- References: <CFC7E449.38985%jamie.hedlund@icann.org> <029701cf8e38$6716bd50$354437f0$@afilias.info> <111D2F94-2031-4EFC-8E5C-378C21A1D746@crediblecontext.com>
- Reply-to: <jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AQKE0dvkx/yRuF7OpskjiGm8O2OiWQGk24Y8ArERAPiZ9F1TcA==
Good question John.
I had expected to introduce the topic (very briefly) and then seek input. It
will be great to get input from the room.
Jonathan
From: John Berard [mailto:john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 25 June 2014 10:17
To: <jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Item 8 lead
Jonathan,
Who will be the lead today on this?
Item 8: DISCUSSION – A cross-community working group to develop a transfer
process for the IANA stewardship role (15 mins)
Based on the meeting so far, he or she may be hard-pressed to stick to the
allotted time. Is there wiggle room to allow floor comment?
Berard
Sent from my iPhone
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|