ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] Re: Item 8 lead

  • To: "<jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>" <jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [council] Re: Item 8 lead
  • From: John Berard <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 10:43:46 +0100
  • Cc: "<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • In-reply-to: <011a01cf9058$60340f20$209c2d60$@afilias.info>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <CFC7E449.38985%jamie.hedlund@icann.org> <029701cf8e38$6716bd50$354437f0$@afilias.info> <111D2F94-2031-4EFC-8E5C-378C21A1D746@crediblecontext.com> <011a01cf9058$60340f20$209c2d60$@afilias.info>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Jonathan,

I am now in the over-subscribed session on IG.  It makes me think the task will 
not be introducing the topic, but keeping it focused and knowing when to end it.

Berard

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jun 25, 2014, at 10:32 AM, "Jonathan Robinson" <jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 
> wrote:
> 
> Good question John.
>  
> I had expected to introduce the topic (very briefly) and then seek input.  It 
> will be great to get input from the room.
>  
> Jonathan
>  
> From: John Berard [mailto:john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: 25 June 2014 10:17
> To: <jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Item 8 lead
>  
> Jonathan,
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Who will be the lead today on this?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Item 8: DISCUSSION – A cross-community working group to develop a transfer 
> process for the IANA stewardship role (15 mins)
> 
> 
> 
> Based on the meeting so far, he or she may be hard-pressed to stick to the 
> allotted time.  Is there wiggle room to allow floor comment?
> 
> 
> Berard
> 
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
>
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>