Re: [council] Action item for the SCI
Jeff you will be added to the list. Glen Envoyé de mon iPhone Le 22 déc. 2012 à 02:03, "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx> a écrit : > > Wolf and Joy, > > I actually do not like the way this is positioned. We should not be asking > the question of whether what we did at the meeting on the 20th was in line > with the Operating Procedures, but rather should consider the notion separate > and apart from the substance of the IOC motion. The question should simply > be "should there be any restrictions on resubmitting motions that previously > appeared before the Council? If so, what should those restrictions be and > are there any exceptions? > > I think it is that simple. > > I am not currently on the SCI, but I would like to be involved in this > question so I would ask if I can now be included on that mailing list. > > Thanks. > > > > Best regards, > > Jeffrey J. Neuman > > Sent from iPad. Please excuse any typos. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Friday, December 21, 2012 05:57 PM Eastern Standard Time > To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [council] Action item for the SCI > > All, > > Following the debate on resubmitting a defeated motion to the council, Joy > and I drafted the council's request for the SCI (see attached). I've already > introduced the item to the SCI, and it has been taken to the SCI's agenda. > > Best regards > Wolf-Ulrich > > Attachment:
smime.p7s
|