<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] Action item for the SCI
- To: "'KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx'" <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>, "'council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] Action item for the SCI
- From: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 20:02:32 -0500
- Accept-language: en-US
- Acceptlanguage: en-US
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: Ac3fzjgBQOen+/dSSN+r4P7xKXNwTwAEc3iB
- Thread-topic: [council] Action item for the SCI
Wolf and Joy,
I actually do not like the way this is positioned. We should not be asking the
question of whether what we did at the meeting on the 20th was in line with the
Operating Procedures, but rather should consider the notion separate and apart
from the substance of the IOC motion. The question should simply be "should
there be any restrictions on resubmitting motions that previously appeared
before the Council? If so, what should those restrictions be and are there any
exceptions?
I think it is that simple.
I am not currently on the SCI, but I would like to be involved in this question
so I would ask if I can now be included on that mailing list.
Thanks.
Best regards,
Jeffrey J. Neuman
Sent from iPad. Please excuse any typos.
-----Original Message-----
From: KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2012 05:57 PM Eastern Standard Time
To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [council] Action item for the SCI
All,
Following the debate on resubmitting a defeated motion to the council, Joy and
I drafted the council's request for the SCI (see attached). I've already
introduced the item to the SCI, and it has been taken to the SCI's agenda.
Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|