GNSO Email Archives: [council]

ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]

<<< Chronological Index >>> <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] Action item for the SCI

To: "<KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>" <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [council] Action item for the SCI
From: John Berard <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 10:29:35 -0800
Cc: "<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <D9F923A733D99945931EF9A6D3436E57015BD7D5648E@HE111646.emea1.cds.t-internal.com>
List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
References: <D9F923A733D99945931EF9A6D3436E57015BD7D5648E@HE111646.emea1.cds.t-internal.com>
Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Wolf,

I do not think the question posed accurately captures the spirit of what 
happened.  The confusion at the time ought to be reason enough for 
reconsideration.

If the SCI considers the question of when a motion may be reconsidered, perhaps 
confusion  can be a trigger!

Berard

Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 21, 2012, at 2:55 PM, <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> All,
>  
> Following the debate on resubmitting a defeated motion to the council, Joy 
> and I drafted the council's request for the SCI (see attached). I've already 
> introduced the item to the SCI, and it has been taken to the SCI's agenda.
>  
> Best regards
> Wolf-Ulrich
>  
> <Motion resubmitting.doc>

References:
- [council] Action item for the SCI
  - From: KnobenW

<<< Chronological Index >>> <<< Thread Index >>>