Re: [council] Friendly Amendments to CCI WG Motion and Charter (motion 7 on the motions page)

[Rosemary Sinclair <rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

That language is in the first Whereas clause and the Charter

Cheers, R

Rosemary Sinclair
Director, External Relations
Australian School of Business
UNSW
+61 413 734490

On 23/09/2011, at 4:48 AM, "Zahid Jamil" <zahid@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I had raised this on a previous call.  Would it be clearer if the language
> of the AoC was also included (which was also in the Board Resolution)?
> 
> Sincerely,
> 
> 
> Zahid Jamil
> Barrister-at-law
> Jamil & Jamil
> Barristers-at-law
> 219-221 Central Hotel Annexe
> Merewether Road, Karachi. Pakistan
> Cell: +923008238230
> Tel: +92 21 35680760 / 35685276 / 35655025
> Fax: +92 21 35655026
> www.jamilandjamil.com
>  
> Notice / Disclaimer
> This message contains confidential information and its contents are being
> communicated only for the intended recipients . If you are not the intended
> recipient you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. 
> Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this
> message by mistake and delete it from your system. The contents above may
> contain/are the intellectual property of DNDRC, and constitute privileged
> information protected by attorney client privilege. The reproduction,
> publication, use, amendment, modification of any kind whatsoever of any part
> or parts (including photocopying or storing it in any medium by electronic
> means whether or not transiently or incidentally or some other use of this
> communication) without prior written permission and consent of DNDRC is
> prohibited.
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Margie Milam
> Sent: 23 September 2011 01:47
> To: Rosette, Kristina; 'Rosemary Sinclair'; Tim Ruiz
> Cc: GNSO Council
> Subject: RE: [council] Friendly Amendments to CCI WG Motion and Charter
> (motion 7 on the motions page)
> 
> 
> Hi Kristina-
> 
> I can  answer this---- the language came from the original Board resolution
> that asked for the GNSO's response on this topic:  see: 
> http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/resolutions-10dec10-en.htm#6
> 
> Margie
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Rosette, Kristina
> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 2:42 PM
> To: 'Rosemary Sinclair'; Tim Ruiz
> Cc: GNSO Council
> Subject: RE: [council] Friendly Amendments to CCI WG Motion and Charter
> (motion 7 on the motions page)
> 
> 
> Rosemary,
> 
> An IPC member has pointed out that "ICANN has committed to promoting
> competition, consumer trust and consumer choice" per the Affirmation of
> Commitments, but that the Working Group has been called CCI for "Consumer
> Choice, Competition, and Innovation".
> 
> I've been asked to find out why "Consumer Trust" was replaced with
> "Innovation."  Can you please advise?  
> 
> Many thanks!
> 
> K
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Rosemary Sinclair
> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 4:36 PM
> To: Tim Ruiz
> Cc: GNSO Council
> Subject: Re: [council] Friendly Amendments to CCI WG Motion and Charter
> (motion 7 on the motions page)
> 
> 
> I'm OK with these amendments except re the Update ....we will be in a
> position to provide an Update (not a report) at Dakar
> 
> So the amendment at Resolved 5 could be ...WG Update.....at Dakar.....
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Rosemary
> 
> Rosemary Sinclair
> Director, External Relations
> Australian School of Business
> UNSW
> +61 413 734490
> 
> On 23/09/2011, at 2:53 AM, "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Rosemary and Wolf,
>> 
>> I appreciate the amendment to the CCI WG motion to delete the word 
>> "joint." I have a few other intended friendly amendments to the motion 
>> and the Charter to be sure there is no confusion or doubt that this is 
>> a GNSO chartered WG, which are always open to all interested parties 
>> regardless of SO/AC affiliation, and to address concerns regarding the 
>> timing of the report.
>> 
>> Friendly amendments to the motion:
>> 
>> 1. Replace "of these SO/ACs" with "party" in the third/last Whereas.
>> 
>> 2. Replace "at the ICANN Dakar Meeting in October, 2011" with "as soon 
>> after the ICANN Dakar Meeting as reasonably possible" in the fifth 
>> (second to last) Resolve. At this point in time it doesn't seem likely 
>> that this WG can form, select a chair, have substantive discussions, 
>> etc. and still produce a report by Dakar.
>> 
>> 3. Strike the last Resolve entirely.
>> 
>> Friendly amendments to the Charter:
>> 
>> 1. Title: change to "GNSO Working Group (WG) Charter."
>> 
>> 2. Chartering Organization(s): change to "GNSO" only.
>> 
>> 3. Deliverables & Timeframes: change "by the ICANN Dakar Meeting" to 
>> "as soon after the ICANN Dakar Meeting as reasonably possible."
>> 
>> 4. Membership Criteria: change to "The CCI WG will be open to all 
>> interested parties."
>> 
>> 5. Group Formation, Dependencies, & Dissolution: change to "This WG 
>> will be formed as a GNSO chartered Working Group."
>> 
>> Finally, just a comment. I guess it works, but it seems redundant to 
>> include excerpts from the GNSO WG Guidelines. IMO, charters should 
>> simply state that those Guidelines apply and go into detail only where 
>> it is proposing a departure from those guidelines with appropriate 
>> reasoning.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Tim
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
>