RE: [council] Friendly Amendments to CCI WG Motion and Charter (motion 7 on the motions page)

["Rosette, Kristina" <krosette@xxxxxxx>]

Got it, thanks. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Rosemary Sinclair [mailto:rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 4:48 PM
To: Rosette, Kristina
Cc: Tim Ruiz; GNSO Council
Subject: Re: [council] Friendly Amendments to CCI WG Motion and Charter (motion 
7 on the motions page)

It's the Topic Title in the Board papers but the work is on definitions for 
competition, consumer trust and consumer choice as per the AOC

Cheers

Rosemary

Rosemary Sinclair
Director, External Relations
Australian School of Business
UNSW
+61 413 734490

On 23/09/2011, at 4:42 AM, "Rosette, Kristina" <krosette@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> Rosemary,
> 
> An IPC member has pointed out that "ICANN has committed to promoting 
> competition, consumer trust and consumer choice" per the Affirmation of 
> Commitments, but that the Working Group has been called CCI for "Consumer 
> Choice, Competition, and Innovation".
> 
> I've been asked to find out why "Consumer Trust" was replaced with 
> "Innovation."  Can you please advise?  
> 
> Many thanks!
> 
> K
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rosemary Sinclair
> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 4:36 PM
> To: Tim Ruiz
> Cc: GNSO Council
> Subject: Re: [council] Friendly Amendments to CCI WG Motion and 
> Charter (motion 7 on the motions page)
> 
> 
> I'm OK with these amendments except re the Update ....we will be in a 
> position to provide an Update (not a report) at Dakar
> 
> So the amendment at Resolved 5 could be ...WG Update.....at Dakar.....
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Rosemary
> 
> Rosemary Sinclair
> Director, External Relations
> Australian School of Business
> UNSW
> +61 413 734490
> 
> On 23/09/2011, at 2:53 AM, "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Rosemary and Wolf,
>> 
>> I appreciate the amendment to the CCI WG motion to delete the word 
>> "joint." I have a few other intended friendly amendments to the 
>> motion and the Charter to be sure there is no confusion or doubt that 
>> this is a GNSO chartered WG, which are always open to all interested 
>> parties regardless of SO/AC affiliation, and to address concerns 
>> regarding the timing of the report.
>> 
>> Friendly amendments to the motion:
>> 
>> 1. Replace "of these SO/ACs" with "party" in the third/last Whereas.
>> 
>> 2. Replace "at the ICANN Dakar Meeting in October, 2011" with "as 
>> soon after the ICANN Dakar Meeting as reasonably possible" in the 
>> fifth (second to last) Resolve. At this point in time it doesn't seem 
>> likely that this WG can form, select a chair, have substantive 
>> discussions, etc. and still produce a report by Dakar.
>> 
>> 3. Strike the last Resolve entirely.
>> 
>> Friendly amendments to the Charter:
>> 
>> 1. Title: change to "GNSO Working Group (WG) Charter."
>> 
>> 2. Chartering Organization(s): change to "GNSO" only.
>> 
>> 3. Deliverables & Timeframes: change "by the ICANN Dakar Meeting" to 
>> "as soon after the ICANN Dakar Meeting as reasonably possible."
>> 
>> 4. Membership Criteria: change to "The CCI WG will be open to all 
>> interested parties."
>> 
>> 5. Group Formation, Dependencies, & Dissolution: change to "This WG 
>> will be formed as a GNSO chartered Working Group."
>> 
>> Finally, just a comment. I guess it works, but it seems redundant to 
>> include excerpts from the GNSO WG Guidelines. IMO, charters should 
>> simply state that those Guidelines apply and go into detail only 
>> where it is proposing a departure from those guidelines with 
>> appropriate reasoning.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Tim
>> 
>> 
>> 
>