Re: [council] Friendly Amendments to CCI WG Motion and Charter (motion 7 on the motions page)

[Rosemary Sinclair <rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

And the 1st Resolved clause!!! R

Rosemary Sinclair
Director, External Relations
Australian School of Business
UNSW
+61 413 734490

On 23/09/2011, at 4:51 AM, "Rosemary Sinclair" <rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx> 
wrote:

> That language is in the first Whereas clause and the Charter
> 
> Cheers, R
> 
> Rosemary Sinclair
> Director, External Relations
> Australian School of Business
> UNSW
> +61 413 734490
> 
> On 23/09/2011, at 4:48 AM, "Zahid Jamil" <zahid@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> I had raised this on a previous call.  Would it be clearer if the language
>> of the AoC was also included (which was also in the Board Resolution)?
>> 
>> Sincerely,
>> 
>> 
>> Zahid Jamil
>> Barrister-at-law
>> Jamil & Jamil
>> Barristers-at-law
>> 219-221 Central Hotel Annexe
>> Merewether Road, Karachi. Pakistan
>> Cell: +923008238230
>> Tel: +92 21 35680760 / 35685276 / 35655025
>> Fax: +92 21 35655026
>> www.jamilandjamil.com
>> 
>> Notice / Disclaimer
>> This message contains confidential information and its contents are being
>> communicated only for the intended recipients . If you are not the intended
>> recipient you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. 
>> Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this
>> message by mistake and delete it from your system. The contents above may
>> contain/are the intellectual property of DNDRC, and constitute privileged
>> information protected by attorney client privilege. The reproduction,
>> publication, use, amendment, modification of any kind whatsoever of any part
>> or parts (including photocopying or storing it in any medium by electronic
>> means whether or not transiently or incidentally or some other use of this
>> communication) without prior written permission and consent of DNDRC is
>> prohibited.
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
>> Behalf Of Margie Milam
>> Sent: 23 September 2011 01:47
>> To: Rosette, Kristina; 'Rosemary Sinclair'; Tim Ruiz
>> Cc: GNSO Council
>> Subject: RE: [council] Friendly Amendments to CCI WG Motion and Charter
>> (motion 7 on the motions page)
>> 
>> 
>> Hi Kristina-
>> 
>> I can  answer this---- the language came from the original Board resolution
>> that asked for the GNSO's response on this topic:  see: 
>> http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/resolutions-10dec10-en.htm#6
>> 
>> Margie
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
>> Behalf Of Rosette, Kristina
>> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 2:42 PM
>> To: 'Rosemary Sinclair'; Tim Ruiz
>> Cc: GNSO Council
>> Subject: RE: [council] Friendly Amendments to CCI WG Motion and Charter
>> (motion 7 on the motions page)
>> 
>> 
>> Rosemary,
>> 
>> An IPC member has pointed out that "ICANN has committed to promoting
>> competition, consumer trust and consumer choice" per the Affirmation of
>> Commitments, but that the Working Group has been called CCI for "Consumer
>> Choice, Competition, and Innovation".
>> 
>> I've been asked to find out why "Consumer Trust" was replaced with
>> "Innovation."  Can you please advise?  
>> 
>> Many thanks!
>> 
>> K
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
>> Behalf Of Rosemary Sinclair
>> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 4:36 PM
>> To: Tim Ruiz
>> Cc: GNSO Council
>> Subject: Re: [council] Friendly Amendments to CCI WG Motion and Charter
>> (motion 7 on the motions page)
>> 
>> 
>> I'm OK with these amendments except re the Update ....we will be in a
>> position to provide an Update (not a report) at Dakar
>> 
>> So the amendment at Resolved 5 could be ...WG Update.....at Dakar.....
>> 
>> Cheers
>> 
>> Rosemary
>> 
>> Rosemary Sinclair
>> Director, External Relations
>> Australian School of Business
>> UNSW
>> +61 413 734490
>> 
>> On 23/09/2011, at 2:53 AM, "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> Rosemary and Wolf,
>>> 
>>> I appreciate the amendment to the CCI WG motion to delete the word 
>>> "joint." I have a few other intended friendly amendments to the motion 
>>> and the Charter to be sure there is no confusion or doubt that this is 
>>> a GNSO chartered WG, which are always open to all interested parties 
>>> regardless of SO/AC affiliation, and to address concerns regarding the 
>>> timing of the report.
>>> 
>>> Friendly amendments to the motion:
>>> 
>>> 1. Replace "of these SO/ACs" with "party" in the third/last Whereas.
>>> 
>>> 2. Replace "at the ICANN Dakar Meeting in October, 2011" with "as soon 
>>> after the ICANN Dakar Meeting as reasonably possible" in the fifth 
>>> (second to last) Resolve. At this point in time it doesn't seem likely 
>>> that this WG can form, select a chair, have substantive discussions, 
>>> etc. and still produce a report by Dakar.
>>> 
>>> 3. Strike the last Resolve entirely.
>>> 
>>> Friendly amendments to the Charter:
>>> 
>>> 1. Title: change to "GNSO Working Group (WG) Charter."
>>> 
>>> 2. Chartering Organization(s): change to "GNSO" only.
>>> 
>>> 3. Deliverables & Timeframes: change "by the ICANN Dakar Meeting" to 
>>> "as soon after the ICANN Dakar Meeting as reasonably possible."
>>> 
>>> 4. Membership Criteria: change to "The CCI WG will be open to all 
>>> interested parties."
>>> 
>>> 5. Group Formation, Dependencies, & Dissolution: change to "This WG 
>>> will be formed as a GNSO chartered Working Group."
>>> 
>>> Finally, just a comment. I guess it works, but it seems redundant to 
>>> include excerpts from the GNSO WG Guidelines. IMO, charters should 
>>> simply state that those Guidelines apply and go into detail only where 
>>> it is proposing a departure from those guidelines with appropriate 
>>> reasoning.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Tim
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>>