Re: [council] Friendly Amendments to CCI WG Motion and Charter (motion 7 on the motions page)

[Rosemary Sinclair <rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I'm OK with these amendments except re the Update ....we will be in a position 
to provide an Update (not a report) at Dakar

So the amendment at Resolved 5 could be ...WG Update.....at Dakar.....

Cheers

Rosemary

Rosemary Sinclair
Director, External Relations
Australian School of Business
UNSW
+61 413 734490

On 23/09/2011, at 2:53 AM, "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> Rosemary and Wolf,
> 
> I appreciate the amendment to the CCI WG motion to delete the word
> "joint." I have a few other intended friendly amendments to the motion
> and the Charter to be sure there is no confusion or doubt that this is a
> GNSO chartered WG, which are always open to all interested parties
> regardless of SO/AC affiliation, and to address concerns regarding the
> timing of the report.
> 
> Friendly amendments to the motion:
> 
> 1. Replace "of these SO/ACs" with "party" in the third/last Whereas.
> 
> 2. Replace "at the ICANN Dakar Meeting in October, 2011" with "as soon
> after the ICANN Dakar Meeting as reasonably possible" in the fifth
> (second to last) Resolve. At this point in time it doesn't seem likely
> that this WG can form, select a chair, have substantive discussions,
> etc. and still produce a report by Dakar.
> 
> 3. Strike the last Resolve entirely.
> 
> Friendly amendments to the Charter:
> 
> 1. Title: change to "GNSO Working Group (WG) Charter."
> 
> 2. Chartering Organization(s): change to "GNSO" only.
> 
> 3. Deliverables & Timeframes: change "by the ICANN Dakar Meeting" to "as
> soon after the ICANN Dakar Meeting as reasonably possible."
> 
> 4. Membership Criteria: change to "The CCI WG will be open to all
> interested parties."
> 
> 5. Group Formation, Dependencies, & Dissolution: change to "This WG will
> be formed as a GNSO chartered Working Group."
> 
> Finally, just a comment. I guess it works, but it seems redundant to
> include excerpts from the GNSO WG Guidelines. IMO, charters should
> simply state that those Guidelines apply and go into detail only where
> it is proposing a departure from those guidelines with appropriate
> reasoning.
> 
> Thanks,
> Tim
> 
> 
>