ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] Current draft


NCUC would share the same concerns.

Bill

On Mar 14, 2011, at 1:27 PM, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:

> Thanks for the very fast turnaround Kristina.
> 
> The registrars would have the same issue as the one Jeff raises I would 
> expect.
> 
> Let's discuss after this if we can.
> 
> Stéphane
> 
> 
> 
> Le 14 mars 2011 à 21:25, Neuman, Jeff a écrit :
> 
>> Again, we have issues with the 3rd paragraph as that it creates the 
>> implication that it would be ok for GAC advice to trump (or override) input 
>> from the bottom-up process of the GNSO. 
>>  
>> Jeffrey J. Neuman 
>> Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
>> 
>> The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the 
>> use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or 
>> privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have 
>> received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, 
>> distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have 
>> received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and 
>> delete the original message.
>>  
>>  
>> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
>> Behalf Of Rosette, Kristina
>> Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 1:20 PM
>> To: 'Stéphane Van Gelder'
>> Cc: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx GNSO
>> Subject: RE: [council] Current draft
>>  
>> OK.  Here's a redline of the text that the IPC has agreed to against Mary's 
>> version of the text. 
>>  
>> To the extent the RySG (or any other SG or Cy) has any concerns about the 
>> text the IPC agreed to, it would be helpful to know that the exact changes 
>> of concern are so that I can try to expedite further IPC consultation.
>>  
>> Thanks.
>>  
>> K
>>  
>>  
>>  
>> From: Stéphane Van Gelder [mailto:stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx] 
>> Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 4:10 PM
>> To: Rosette, Kristina
>> Cc: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx GNSO
>> Subject: Re: [council] Current draft
>> 
>> That is extremely helpful, thank you Kristina.
>>  
>> Stéphane
>>  
>>  
>>  
>> Le 14 mars 2011 à 21:09, Rosette, Kristina a écrit :
>> 
>> 
>> I thought I went from your "later in time" message, which I assumed was the 
>> most up to date.  Let me run a redline of Mary's against yours and see what 
>> the differences are (and if my IPC colleagues have views on them).
>>  
>> K
>>  
>> From: Stéphane Van Gelder [mailto:stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx] 
>> Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 4:08 PM
>> To: Rosette, Kristina
>> Cc: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx GNSO
>> Subject: Re: [council] Current draft
>> 
>> Thanks Kristina,
>>  
>> Just for clarification, this seems to be based on the text we sent yesterday 
>> after the meeting, but since then Mary sent a reworked version that most 
>> people have already agreed to.
>>  
>> Has that version been considered by your group? It would seem simply to 
>> build on that version, rather than go back a step and start from the 
>> previous version.
>>  
>> Thanks,
>>  
>> Stéphane
>>  
>>  
>>  
>> Le 14 mars 2011 à 21:03, Rosette, Kristina a écrit :
>> 
>> 
>> Attached (in clean and redline form) is text that the IPC has agreed to 
>> support.   Please let me know if you have questions and I will do my best to 
>> answer them.
>>  
>> K
>>  
>>  
>> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
>> Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder
>> Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 12:35 PM
>> To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx GNSO
>> Subject: Fwd: [council] Current draft
>> 
>> Councillors,
>>  
>> As these group comments will have to be read out this afternoon, at the 
>> start of the sessions, we need to move forwards on finalising the Council 
>> comment asap.
>>  
>> Does the proposed text below suit everyone? If not, please provide proposed 
>> edits by this lunch time. I would like to have final approval on a text from 
>> the Council by the time we meet with the ccNSO at lunchtime. This will help 
>> give enough time to forward the text to the Board and the GAC before I read 
>> it out to them this afternoon. I am sure that is a courtesy they would 
>> appreciate.
>>  
>> Thanks,
>>  
>> Stéphane
>>  
>>  
>>  
>> Début du message réexpédié :
>> 
>> 
>> De : Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> Date : 13 mars 2011 22:11:25 HNEC
>> À : "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Stéphane Van 
>> Gelder" <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Objet : Rép : [council] Current draft
>>  
>> Will something like this work?
>>  
>> "The GNSO would like to thank the Board and the GAC for the hard work that 
>> has been done during the recent and ongoing consultations. The GNSO 
>> appreciates these efforts to bring to a close the implementation of the 
>> Policy Development Process that it approved by supermajority vote in 2007.
>> The GNSO is ready to help the Board and the GAC complete work on the issues 
>> that are currently before them and to provide any detail or context that may 
>> be needed during those discussions.
>> We wish to emphasize the importance of the bottom-up multi-stakeholder 
>> approach and request that in formulating any further changes to and new 
>> elements for the final version of the Applicant Guidebook, the Board fully 
>> consider the input provided by the GNSO.
>> We also ask that any resulting modifications to the Applicant Guidebook be 
>> carried out in a timely manner and the final version of that Guidebook be 
>> published as soon as possible."
>>  
>> Cheers
>> Mary 
>> 
>> 
>>  
>>  
>> Mary W S Wong
>> Professor of Law
>> Chair, Graduate IP Programs
>> UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAW
>> Two White Street
>> Concord, NH 03301
>> USA
>> Email: mary.wong@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> Phone: 1-603-513-5143
>> Webpage: http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.php
>> Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) 
>> at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584
>> >>>
>> From:
>> Stéphane Van Gelder<stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
>> To:
>> "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Date:
>> 3/13/2011 4:50 PM
>> Subject:
>> [council] Current draft
>>  
>> <redline statement to Board.DOC><IPC suggested revision to GNSO Council.DOC>
>>  
>>  
> 



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>