Re: [council] Current draft

[Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>]

That is extremely helpful, thank you Kristina.

Stéphane



Le 14 mars 2011 à 21:09, Rosette, Kristina a écrit :

> I thought I went from your "later in time" message, which I assumed was the 
> most up to date.  Let me run a redline of Mary's against yours and see what 
> the differences are (and if my IPC colleagues have views on them).
>  
> K
> 
> From: Stéphane Van Gelder [mailto:stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 4:08 PM
> To: Rosette, Kristina
> Cc: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx GNSO
> Subject: Re: [council] Current draft
> 
> Thanks Kristina,
> 
> Just for clarification, this seems to be based on the text we sent yesterday 
> after the meeting, but since then Mary sent a reworked version that most 
> people have already agreed to.
> 
> Has that version been considered by your group? It would seem simply to build 
> on that version, rather than go back a step and start from the previous 
> version.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Stéphane
> 
> 
> 
> Le 14 mars 2011 à 21:03, Rosette, Kristina a écrit :
> 
>> Attached (in clean and redline form) is text that the IPC has agreed to 
>> support.   Please let me know if you have questions and I will do my best to 
>> answer them.
>>  
>> K
>>  
>>  
>> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
>> Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder
>> Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 12:35 PM
>> To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx GNSO
>> Subject: Fwd: [council] Current draft
>> 
>> Councillors,
>> 
>> As these group comments will have to be read out this afternoon, at the 
>> start of the sessions, we need to move forwards on finalising the Council 
>> comment asap.
>> 
>> Does the proposed text below suit everyone? If not, please provide proposed 
>> edits by this lunch time. I would like to have final approval on a text from 
>> the Council by the time we meet with the ccNSO at lunchtime. This will help 
>> give enough time to forward the text to the Board and the GAC before I read 
>> it out to them this afternoon. I am sure that is a courtesy they would 
>> appreciate.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Stéphane
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Début du message réexpédié :
>> 
>>> De : Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Date : 13 mars 2011 22:11:25 HNEC
>>> À : "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Stéphane Van 
>>> Gelder" <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> Objet : Rép : [council] Current draft
>>> 
>>> Will something like this work?
>>>  
>>> "The GNSO would like to thank the Board and the GAC for the hard work that 
>>> has been done during the recent and ongoing consultations. The GNSO 
>>> appreciates these efforts to bring to a close the implementation of the 
>>> Policy Development Process that it approved by supermajority vote in 2007.
>>> The GNSO is ready to help the Board and the GAC complete work on the issues 
>>> that are currently before them and to provide any detail or context that 
>>> may be needed during those discussions.
>>> We wish to emphasize the importance of the bottom-up multi-stakeholder 
>>> approach and request that in formulating any further changes to and new 
>>> elements for the final version of the Applicant Guidebook, the Board fully 
>>> consider the input provided by the GNSO.
>>> We also ask that any resulting modifications to the Applicant Guidebook be 
>>> carried out in a timely manner and the final version of that Guidebook be 
>>> published as soon as possible."
>>>  
>>> Cheers
>>> Mary 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>  
>>>  
>>> Mary W S Wong
>>> Professor of Law
>>> Chair, Graduate IP Programs
>>> UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAW
>>> Two White Street
>>> Concord, NH 03301
>>> USA
>>> Email: mary.wong@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Phone: 1-603-513-5143
>>> Webpage: http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.php
>>> Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) 
>>> at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584
>>> >>>
>>> From:       Stéphane Van Gelder<stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> To: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Date:       3/13/2011 4:50 PM
>>> Subject:    [council] Current draft
>> 
>> <redline statement to Board.DOC><IPC suggested revision to GNSO Council.DOC>
>