RE: [council] Current draft
How would this work? Jeffrey J. Neuman Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy ________________________________ The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message. From: Stéphane Van Gelder [mailto:stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 1:27 PM To: Neuman, Jeff Cc: Rosette, Kristina; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx GNSO Subject: Re: [council] Current draft Thanks for the very fast turnaround Kristina. The registrars would have the same issue as the one Jeff raises I would expect. Let's discuss after this if we can. Stéphane Le 14 mars 2011 à 21:25, Neuman, Jeff a écrit : Again, we have issues with the 3rd paragraph as that it creates the implication that it would be ok for GAC advice to trump (or override) input from the bottom-up process of the GNSO. Jeffrey J. Neuman Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy ________________________________ The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message. From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rosette, Kristina Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 1:20 PM To: 'Stéphane Van Gelder' Cc: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> GNSO Subject: RE: [council] Current draft OK. Here's a redline of the text that the IPC has agreed to against Mary's version of the text. To the extent the RySG (or any other SG or Cy) has any concerns about the text the IPC agreed to, it would be helpful to know that the exact changes of concern are so that I can try to expedite further IPC consultation. Thanks. K ________________________________ From: Stéphane Van Gelder [mailto:stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 4:10 PM To: Rosette, Kristina Cc: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> GNSO Subject: Re: [council] Current draft That is extremely helpful, thank you Kristina. Stéphane Le 14 mars 2011 à 21:09, Rosette, Kristina a écrit : I thought I went from your "later in time" message, which I assumed was the most up to date. Let me run a redline of Mary's against yours and see what the differences are (and if my IPC colleagues have views on them). K ________________________________ From: Stéphane Van Gelder [mailto:stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 4:08 PM To: Rosette, Kristina Cc: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> GNSO Subject: Re: [council] Current draft Thanks Kristina, Just for clarification, this seems to be based on the text we sent yesterday after the meeting, but since then Mary sent a reworked version that most people have already agreed to. Has that version been considered by your group? It would seem simply to build on that version, rather than go back a step and start from the previous version. Thanks, Stéphane Le 14 mars 2011 à 21:03, Rosette, Kristina a écrit : Attached (in clean and redline form) is text that the IPC has agreed to support. Please let me know if you have questions and I will do my best to answer them. K ________________________________ From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 12:35 PM To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> GNSO Subject: Fwd: [council] Current draft Councillors, As these group comments will have to be read out this afternoon, at the start of the sessions, we need to move forwards on finalising the Council comment asap. Does the proposed text below suit everyone? If not, please provide proposed edits by this lunch time. I would like to have final approval on a text from the Council by the time we meet with the ccNSO at lunchtime. This will help give enough time to forward the text to the Board and the GAC before I read it out to them this afternoon. I am sure that is a courtesy they would appreciate. Thanks, Stéphane Début du message réexpédié : De : Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date : 13 mars 2011 22:11:25 HNEC À : "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>, "Stéphane Van Gelder" <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>> Objet : Rép : [council] Current draft Will something like this work? "The GNSO would like to thank the Board and the GAC for the hard work that has been done during the recent and ongoing consultations. The GNSO appreciates these efforts to bring to a close the implementation of the Policy Development Process that it approved by supermajority vote in 2007. The GNSO is ready to help the Board and the GAC complete work on the issues that are currently before them and to provide any detail or context that may be needed during those discussions. We wish to emphasize the importance of the bottom-up multi-stakeholder approach and request that in formulating any further changes to and new elements for the final version of the Applicant Guidebook, the Board fully consider the input provided by the GNSO. We also ask that any resulting modifications to the Applicant Guidebook be carried out in a timely manner and the final version of that Guidebook be published as soon as possible." Cheers Mary Mary W S Wong Professor of Law Chair, Graduate IP Programs UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAW Two White Street Concord, NH 03301 USA Email: mary.wong@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:mary.wong@xxxxxxxxxxx> Phone: 1-603-513-5143 Webpage: http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.php Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584 >>> From: Stéphane Van Gelder<stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>> To: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> Date: 3/13/2011 4:50 PM Subject: [council] Current draft <redline statement to Board.DOC><IPC suggested revision to GNSO Council.DOC> Attachment:
RySG suggested revision to GNSO Council (2).docx
|