RE: [council] Fwd: suggested topics for joint ccNSO/GNSO Council meeting tomorrow

["Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Agree. Unfortunately, I may not be able to attend this lunch meeting,
but this is the first topic that would make me truly regret it. 


Tim

> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: RE: [council] Fwd: suggested topics for joint ccNSO/GNSO
> Council meeting tomorrow
> From: "Andrei Kolesnikov" <andrei@xxxxxxxx>
> Date: Sun, March 13, 2011 1:38 pm
> To: "'Stéphane Van Gelder'" <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>,       
> <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Yet another topic that might be interesting for discussion: should we 
> exchange ideas regarding NTIA notice of inquiry on the IANA functions? 
> Retirement of the tlds?
>  
> --andrei
>  
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of Stephane Van Gelder
> Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2011 7:28 AM
> To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx GNSO
> Subject: [council] Fwd: suggested topics for joint ccNSO/GNSO Council meeting 
> tomorrow
> 
> 
>  
> All,
>  
> 
> As it was necessary to provide the ccNSO with information on the topics we 
> suggest we might discuss in advance, I have sent the following email to Chris 
> Disspain.
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks,
> 
>  
> Stéphane
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> Début du message réexpédié :
> 
> 
> 
> 
> De : Stéphane Van Gelder 
> 
> Date : 13 mars 2011 05:26:15 HNEC
> 
> À : Chris Disspain 
> 
> Objet : suggested topics for joint ccNSO/GNSO Council meeting tomorrow
> 
>  
> Chris,
>  
> 
> The GNSO Council has put together the following list of questions for our 
> joint meeting tomorrow.
> 
>  
> 
> We look forward to meeting with the ccNSO.
> 
>  
> 
> Stéphane
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> - A short explanation of how the 2 Councils work.
> 
> - What are the ccNSO currently working on, and which of these projects do you 
> anticipate direct GNSO input/feedback to be useful (if any)?
> 
> - Does the ccNSO see value in meeting with the GNSO Council and if so, how 
> can we maximise that value?
> 
> - There are big changes to the current ICANN landscape coming, with respect 
> to new gTLDs, what would the ccNSO's position be on cc operators that plan to 
> run gTLDs?
> 
> - Is it likely the move from cc to more general purpose (eg. .CO, .ME, .TV) 
> will accelerate?
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
>