ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] Fwd: suggested topics for joint GAC/GNSO Council meeting tomorrow

  • To: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [council] Fwd: suggested topics for joint GAC/GNSO Council meeting tomorrow
  • From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 05:28:01 +0100
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <D63D069E-1845-4AE7-8333-E5EC018BB2CB@indom.com>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In the same vein, I have sent the following email to Heather Dryden.

Stéphane



Début du message réexpédié :

> De : Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date : 13 mars 2011 05:24:22 HNEC
> À : Heather Dryden <Heather.Dryden@xxxxxxxx>
> Objet : suggested topics for joint GAC/GNSO Council meeting tomorrow
> 
> Heather,
> 
> The GNSO Council has put together the following list of questions for our 
> joint meeting tomorrow.
> 
> We look forward to meeting with the GAC.
> 
> Stéphane
> 
> - Would a group of GAC and GNSO Council volunteers to discuss issues of 
> common interest be a good idea?
> 
> - Should we work on finding a new liaison from the GAC to the GNSO ?
> 
> - How can the GNSO assist the GAC and the Board to implement the ATRT recs 
> #12 & #13 recs (i.e. engaging the GAC earlier in the policy development 
> process, and ensuring that the GAC is fully informed as to the policy agenda 
> at ICANN)? Would CWGs be useful in this regard? What is the GAC's views on 
> CWGs and how would the GAC propose such groups' recommendations be processed?



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>