<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] Fwd: suggested topics for joint GAC/GNSO Council meeting tomorrow
- To: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] Fwd: suggested topics for joint GAC/GNSO Council meeting tomorrow
- From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 05:28:01 +0100
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <D63D069E-1845-4AE7-8333-E5EC018BB2CB@indom.com>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In the same vein, I have sent the following email to Heather Dryden.
Stéphane
Début du message réexpédié :
> De : Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date : 13 mars 2011 05:24:22 HNEC
> À : Heather Dryden <Heather.Dryden@xxxxxxxx>
> Objet : suggested topics for joint GAC/GNSO Council meeting tomorrow
>
> Heather,
>
> The GNSO Council has put together the following list of questions for our
> joint meeting tomorrow.
>
> We look forward to meeting with the GAC.
>
> Stéphane
>
> - Would a group of GAC and GNSO Council volunteers to discuss issues of
> common interest be a good idea?
>
> - Should we work on finding a new liaison from the GAC to the GNSO ?
>
> - How can the GNSO assist the GAC and the Board to implement the ATRT recs
> #12 & #13 recs (i.e. engaging the GAC earlier in the policy development
> process, and ensuring that the GAC is fully informed as to the policy agenda
> at ICANN)? Would CWGs be useful in this regard? What is the GAC's views on
> CWGs and how would the GAC propose such groups' recommendations be processed?
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|